PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGG vs. NACP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGG vs. NACP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGG achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 22.18% return.


ESGG

1D
-0.48%
1M
8.86%
YTD
14.72%
6M
16.28%
1Y
31.41%
3Y*
21.51%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*

NACP

1D
-0.13%
1M
9.92%
YTD
22.18%
6M
20.98%
1Y
43.81%
3Y*
27.18%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGG vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ESGG
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund
14.72%24.01%14.48%25.57%-18.66%23.76%17.32%29.10%-11.00%
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
22.18%21.38%23.93%29.69%-23.05%27.62%26.00%30.74%-8.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGG and NACP is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2018

0.87

The correlation between ESGG and NACP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGG vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGG
NACP

Technology

39.9%
35.8%

Financial Services

19.4%
10.6%

Healthcare

11.8%
9.2%

Industrials

5.2%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
3.6%

Energy

4.3%
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
11.1%

Basic Materials

2.4%
1.5%

Utilities

2.1%
3.4%

Real Estate

1.2%
1.3%

Communication Services

0.9%
9.8%

Technology

ESGG
39.9%
NACP
35.8%

Financial Services

ESGG
19.4%
NACP
10.6%

Healthcare

ESGG
11.8%
NACP
9.2%

Industrials

ESGG
5.2%
NACP
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

ESGG
5.0%
NACP
3.6%

Energy

ESGG
4.3%
NACP
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGG
4.0%
NACP
11.1%

Basic Materials

ESGG
2.4%
NACP
1.5%

Utilities

ESGG
2.1%
NACP
3.4%

Real Estate

ESGG
1.2%
NACP
1.3%

Communication Services

ESGG
0.9%
NACP
9.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGG vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGG
ESGG Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ESGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGG Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGG Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

NACP
NACP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NACP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NACP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGG vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGGNACPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.54

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

4.56

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.38

20.04

-4.66

ESGG vs. NACP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGG Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the NACP Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGG and NACP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGGNACPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

3.14

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.92

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.93

-0.07

Drawdowns

ESGG vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGG drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, roughly equal to the maximum NACP drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG and NACP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGGNACPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-30.96%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-9.65%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.71%

-19.66%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-27.89%

+0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.13%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-5.75%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

2.19%

-0.14%

Volatility

ESGG vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) is 3.76%, while Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that ESGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGGNACPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

4.44%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

11.13%

-1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.05%

14.02%

-1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

17.47%

-1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.51%

18.70%

-2.19%

ESGG vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESGG vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison

ESGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than NACP's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESGG
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund
1.21%1.39%1.84%1.73%1.83%1.34%1.36%1.94%2.12%1.71%0.87%
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
0.55%0.62%2.96%1.28%3.48%3.06%1.48%1.22%0.71%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGG and NACP have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NACP has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to ESGG (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGG dropped -32.31% vs NACP's -30.96%.

On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 15.98% vs 12.78% for ESGG. On fees, ESGG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, ESGG has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 12.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.

ESGG has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.55% for NACP.

ESGG tracks STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ESGG and 0.49% for NACP.

NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGG and NACP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer