ESGG.L vs. WNRG.L
ESGG.L (Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and WNRG.L (State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - ESGG.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while WNRG.L tracks the MSCI World Energy 35/20 Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGG.L returned 11.60%/yr vs 21.56%/yr for WNRG.L. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ESGG.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for WNRG.L.
Performance
ESGG.L vs. WNRG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ESGG.L is traded in GBp, while WNRG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WNRG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGG.L achieves a 10.54% return, which is significantly lower than WNRG.L's 30.53% return.
ESGG.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- YTD
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 19.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 11.60%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.86%
WNRG.L
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 7.65%
- 6M
- 23.17%
- YTD
- 30.53%
- 1Y
- 36.43%
- 3Y*
- 14.25%
- 5Y*
- 21.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| £17.70K | £131.17K | £72.51K | |
| £366.67K | £683.78K | £789.28K |
ESGG.L vs. WNRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGG.L Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 10.54% | 12.19% | 20.44% | 18.59% | -10.70% | 24.45% | 14.92% | -13.64% |
WNRG.L State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 30.53% | 6.65% | 3.85% | -1.65% | 64.04% | 40.05% | -32.40% | -2.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGG.L and WNRG.L is -0.17, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019 | 0.35 |
The correlation between ESGG.L and WNRG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ESGG.L vs. WNRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGG.L
WNRG.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
ESGG.L
WNRG.L
-
Financial Services
ESGG.L
WNRG.L
-
Industrials
ESGG.L
WNRG.L
-
Healthcare
ESGG.L
WNRG.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
ESGG.L
WNRG.L
-
Communication Services
ESGG.L
WNRG.L
Consumer Defensive
ESGG.L
WNRG.L
-
Basic Materials
ESGG.L
WNRG.L
-
Energy
ESGG.L
WNRG.L
Utilities
ESGG.L
WNRG.L
-
Real Estate
ESGG.L
WNRG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGG.L vs. WNRG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESGG.L
WNRG.L
ESGG.L vs. WNRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESGG.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGG.L | WNRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 2.20 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.27 | 5.62 | +4.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGG.L vs. WNRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGG.L drawdown since its inception was -29.72%, smaller than the maximum WNRG.L drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG.L and WNRG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGG.L | WNRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.72% | -59.34% | +29.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.11% | -16.52% | +9.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.64% | -21.66% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.64% | -22.11% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -8.20% | +6.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.53% | -12.65% | +7.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 6.47% | -4.59% |
Volatility
ESGG.L vs. WNRG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESGG.L) is 3.26%, while State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that ESGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGG.L | WNRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 7.00% | -3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.55% | 18.98% | -10.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.14% | 21.76% | -10.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.54% | 23.80% | -10.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 33.24% | -16.59% |
ESGG.L vs. WNRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGG.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than WNRG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGG.L vs. WNRG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESGG.L nor WNRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGG.L and WNRG.L have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESGG.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESGG.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WNRG.L.
ESGG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while WNRG.L tracks MSCI World Energy 35/20 Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ESGG.L and 0.30% for WNRG.L.
Find the right allocation for ESGG.L and WNRG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer