PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGD vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ESGD vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ESGD vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
0.56%29.63%4.76%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-22.62%-6.41%99.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGD achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -22.62% return.


ESGD

1D
3.29%
1M
-8.25%
YTD
0.56%
6M
4.79%
1Y
21.50%
3Y*
13.70%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*

IBIT

1D
1.96%
1M
3.31%
YTD
-22.62%
6M
-40.89%
1Y
-17.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ESGD vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

ESGD vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGD
ESGD Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ESGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGD Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGD Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGD vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGDIBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

-0.40

+1.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

-0.29

+2.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.97

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

-0.39

+2.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.75

-0.83

+7.58

ESGD vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGD Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGD and IBIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGDIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

-0.40

+1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.35

+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between ESGD and IBIT is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ESGD vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

ESGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
3.58%3.60%3.23%3.02%2.59%2.75%1.63%2.57%2.69%2.65%0.09%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ESGD vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGD drawdown since its inception was -33.70%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGD and IBIT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGDIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.70%

-49.36%

+15.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.68%

-49.36%

+37.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.42%

-46.11%

+37.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.25%

-14.13%

+7.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

23.09%

-20.06%

Volatility

ESGD vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) is 7.99%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that ESGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ESGDIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.99%

12.99%

-5.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.29%

36.75%

-25.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.75%

45.42%

-27.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.45%

51.26%

-34.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

51.26%

-34.32%