PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ESGD vs. GEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ESGD vs. GEQT.TO

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

ESGD (iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF) and GEQT.TO (iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGD is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Extended ESG Focus Index, while GEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares. ESGD is passively managed, while GEQT.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGD returned 7.96%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for GEQT.TO. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESGD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GEQT.TO.

Performance

ESGD vs. GEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) and iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESGD is traded in USD, while GEQT.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the GEQT.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGD achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly lower than GEQT.TO's 12.02% return.

ESGD

1D
0.25%
1M
1.66%
YTD
9.13%
6M
10.49%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
15.55%
5Y*
7.96%
10Y*
—

GEQT.TO

1D
0.54%
1M
1.40%
YTD
12.02%
6M
10.91%
1Y
26.61%
3Y*
20.49%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGD vs. GEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF		9.13%29.63%3.95%18.53%-15.17%11.79%13.40%
GEQT.TO
iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio		12.02%23.49%15.63%25.34%-20.25%22.05%9.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGD and GEQT.TO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2020

0.50

The correlation between ESGD and GEQT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESGD vs. GEQT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ESGD
GEQT.TO

Financial Services

25.8%
29.0%

Industrials

18.2%
8.6%

Technology

12.6%
34.2%

Healthcare

9.9%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.0%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
5.0%

Basic Materials

5.5%
7.0%

Communication Services

4.3%
2.8%

Energy

3.9%
0.1%

Utilities

3.7%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.6%
2.9%

Financial Services

ESGD
25.8%
GEQT.TO
29.0%

Industrials

ESGD
18.2%
GEQT.TO
8.6%

Technology

ESGD
12.6%
GEQT.TO
34.2%

Healthcare

ESGD
9.9%
GEQT.TO
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

ESGD
7.0%
GEQT.TO
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGD
6.6%
GEQT.TO
5.0%

Basic Materials

ESGD
5.5%
GEQT.TO
7.0%

Communication Services

ESGD
4.3%
GEQT.TO
2.8%

Energy

ESGD
3.9%
GEQT.TO
0.1%

Utilities

ESGD
3.7%
GEQT.TO
1.0%

Real Estate

ESGD
1.6%
GEQT.TO
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF

iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio

Often compared with ESGD:
ESGD vs. ESGUESGD vs. ESGVESGD vs. DMXFESGD vs. SPYESGD vs. SDGESGD vs. FNIDXESGD vs. VOO
Often compared with GEQT.TO:
GEQT.TO vs. XEQT.TOGEQT.TO vs. GGRO.TOGEQT.TO vs. ZAG.TOGEQT.TO vs. GBAL.TOGEQT.TO vs. XEN.TOGEQT.TO vs. XBAL.TOGEQT.TO vs. VT

Return for Risk

ESGD vs. GEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ESGD
ESGD Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ESGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGD Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGD Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO
GEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGD vs. GEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) and iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ESGDGEQT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.23
1.69

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.81
2.34

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.31

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

2.42

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.22

10.35

-4.13

ESGD vs. GEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGD Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the GEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGD and GEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESGD vs. GEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGD drawdown since its inception was -33.70%, which is greater than GEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGD and GEQT.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ESGDGEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.70%

-30.45%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.68%

-10.59%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.86%

-18.97%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.03%

-30.45%

+0.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-1.70%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-6.88%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.47%

+0.67%

Volatility

ESGD vs. GEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) and iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO) have volatilities of 5.56% and 5.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ESGDGEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

5.82%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.31%

12.72%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.85%

15.19%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

18.89%

-2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.00%

18.64%

-1.64%

ESGD vs. GEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GEQT.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ESGD vs. GEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

ESGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than GEQT.TO's 1.11% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF		3.30%3.60%3.23%3.02%2.59%2.75%1.63%2.57%2.69%2.65%0.09%
GEQT.TO
iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio		1.11%1.26%1.38%1.58%1.82%1.32%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

ESGD and GEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESGD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESGD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GEQT.TO.

ESGD is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GEQT.TO is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ESGD and 0.25% for GEQT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGD and GEQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer