ESGD vs. EFIV
ESGD (iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF) and EFIV (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGD is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Extended ESG Focus Index, while EFIV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGD returned 7.90%/yr vs 14.48%/yr for EFIV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESGD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for EFIV.
Performance
ESGD vs. EFIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGD achieves a 8.31% return, which is significantly lower than EFIV's 9.91% return.
ESGD
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 8.31%
- 6M
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- 20.25%
- 3Y*
- 15.89%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- —
EFIV
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 10.51%
- 1Y
- 30.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.82%
- 5Y*
- 14.48%
- 10Y*
- —
ESGD vs. EFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGD iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF | 8.31% | 29.63% | 3.95% | 18.53% | -15.17% | 11.79% | 15.91% |
EFIV State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF | 9.91% | 18.47% | 23.80% | 27.92% | -17.76% | 31.70% | 16.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGD and EFIV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020 | 0.74 |
The correlation between ESGD and EFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESGD vs. EFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGD
EFIV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
ESGD
EFIV
Industrials
ESGD
EFIV
Technology
ESGD
EFIV
Healthcare
ESGD
EFIV
Consumer Cyclical
ESGD
EFIV
Consumer Defensive
ESGD
EFIV
Basic Materials
ESGD
EFIV
Communication Services
ESGD
EFIV
Energy
ESGD
EFIV
Utilities
ESGD
EFIV
Real Estate
ESGD
EFIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGD vs. EFIV — Risk / Return Rank
ESGD
EFIV
ESGD vs. EFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGD | EFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.47 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 3.24 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.53 | 15.02 | -8.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGD | EFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 2.60 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.86 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 1.06 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
ESGD vs. EFIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGD drawdown since its inception was -33.70%, which is greater than EFIV's maximum drawdown of -24.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGD and EFIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGD | EFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.70% | -24.52% | -9.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.68% | -9.44% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.86% | -19.23% | +5.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.03% | -24.52% | -5.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -1.02% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -4.81% | -1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 2.04% | +1.07% |
Volatility
ESGD vs. EFIV - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) at 3.14%. This indicates that ESGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGD | EFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 3.14% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.59% | 9.00% | +3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 11.79% | +3.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 16.92% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 16.83% | +0.14% |
ESGD vs. EFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EFIV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESGD vs. EFIV - Dividend Comparison
ESGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than EFIV's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFIV State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 1.37% | 1.64% | 1.19% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ESGD iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.33% | 3.60% | 3.23% | 3.02% | 2.59% | 2.75% | 1.63% | 2.57% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGD and EFIV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESGD has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to EFIV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGD dropped -33.70% vs EFIV's -24.52%.
On 5-year performance, EFIV leads with 14.48% vs 7.90% for ESGD. On fees, EFIV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, EFIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EFIV has performed better with a 14.48% return vs 7.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFIV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ESGD.
ESGD has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 0.94% for EFIV.
ESGD is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EFIV is S&P 500. ESGD tracks MSCI EAFE Extended ESG Focus Index, while EFIV tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ESGD and 0.10% for EFIV.
EFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGD and EFIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer