PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ESGB.L vs. DRVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ESGB.L vs. DRVG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ESGB.L (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD) and DRVG.L (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from VanEck and Global X respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESGB.L returned 16.72%/yr vs 17.58%/yr for DRVG.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESGB.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DRVG.L.

Performance

ESGB.L vs. DRVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGB.L achieves a -13.64% return, which is significantly lower than DRVG.L's 39.92% return.

ESGB.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
-13.64%
6M
-17.38%
1Y
-11.52%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
—

DRVG.L

1D
-1.69%
1M
7.47%
YTD
39.92%
6M
36.85%
1Y
88.86%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGB.L vs. DRVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESGB.L
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD		-13.64%18.62%51.06%25.92%-27.12%-9.72%
DRVG.L
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing		39.92%20.43%-4.12%19.60%-26.53%-3.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGB.L and DRVG.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between ESGB.L and DRVG.L has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ESGB.L vs. DRVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ESGB.L
DRVG.L

Communication Services

76.9%
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

14.2%
25.2%

Technology

8.9%
37.7%

Basic Materials

-

13.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

18.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

ESGB.L
76.9%
DRVG.L
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGB.L
14.2%
DRVG.L
25.2%

Technology

ESGB.L
8.9%
DRVG.L
37.7%

Basic Materials

ESGB.L

-

DRVG.L
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

ESGB.L

-

DRVG.L

-

Energy

ESGB.L

-

DRVG.L

-

Financial Services

ESGB.L

-

DRVG.L

-

Healthcare

ESGB.L

-

DRVG.L

-

Industrials

ESGB.L

-

DRVG.L
18.0%

Real Estate

ESGB.L

-

DRVG.L

-

Utilities

ESGB.L

-

DRVG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD

Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing

Often compared with ESGB.L:
ESGB.L vs. ESPOESGB.L vs. DFNS.LESGB.L vs. XLKQ.LESGB.L vs. IITU.LESGB.L vs. ANRJ.LESGB.L vs. XSTC.LESGB.L vs. AIAG.L
Often compared with DRVG.L:
DRVG.L vs. KARP.LDRVG.L vs. EUADDRVG.L vs. KLWD.LDRVG.L vs. COPG.LDRVG.L vs. FDN.LDRVG.L vs. SHLG.LDRVG.L vs. IUIT.L

Return for Risk

ESGB.L vs. DRVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ESGB.L
ESGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ESGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
DRVG.L
DRVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DRVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DRVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGB.L vs. DRVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ESGB.LDRVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.68
3.95

-4.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.86
4.88

-5.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.61

-0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

8.53

-8.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.76

24.30

-25.06

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESGB.L vs. DRVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGB.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the DRVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGB.L and DRVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ESGB.LDRVG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.68

3.95

-4.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.28

+0.42

Drawdowns

ESGB.L vs. DRVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGB.L drawdown since its inception was -39.40%, roughly equal to the maximum DRVG.L drawdown of -40.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGB.L and DRVG.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ESGB.LDRVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.40%

-40.24%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.63%

-10.43%

-16.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.63%

-34.13%

+7.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.60%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.21%

-2.16%

-23.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.09%

-17.78%

+4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.99%

3.67%

+11.32%

Volatility

ESGB.L vs. DRVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) is 3.96%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) has a volatility of 9.22%. This indicates that ESGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ESGB.LDRVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

9.22%

-5.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.09%

16.49%

-3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.79%

22.57%

-5.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.02%

25.06%

-3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.81%

25.06%

-2.25%

ESGB.L vs. DRVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGB.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DRVG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESGB.L vs. DRVG.L - Dividend Comparison

ESGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.

PositionTTM2025202420232022
DRVG.L
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing		0.44%0.94%0.58%0.01%0.01%
ESGB.L
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

ESGB.L and DRVG.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DRVG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRVG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESGB.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESGB.L and 0.50% for DRVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGB.L and DRVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer