PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESG vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESG vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESG achieves a 12.20% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 10.60% return.


ESG

1D
-0.45%
1M
7.28%
YTD
12.20%
6M
13.15%
1Y
25.90%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
12.73%
10Y*

BBUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESG vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
12.20%16.04%20.22%27.86%-19.89%28.48%20.75%17.35%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
10.60%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%

Correlation

The correlation between ESG and BBUS is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.98

The correlation between ESG and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESG vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESG
BBUS

Technology

36.7%
37.1%

Financial Services

16.9%
10.8%

Healthcare

11.2%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
4.5%

Industrials

4.5%
7.2%

Energy

3.1%
3.2%

Basic Materials

3.0%
1.2%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.7%

Communication Services

1.0%
10.8%

Utilities

0.7%
2.6%

Technology

ESG
36.7%
BBUS
37.1%

Financial Services

ESG
16.9%
BBUS
10.8%

Healthcare

ESG
11.2%
BBUS
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ESG
10.0%
BBUS
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

ESG
9.2%
BBUS
4.5%

Industrials

ESG
4.5%
BBUS
7.2%

Energy

ESG
3.1%
BBUS
3.2%

Basic Materials

ESG
3.0%
BBUS
1.2%

Real Estate

ESG
2.7%
BBUS
1.7%

Communication Services

ESG
1.0%
BBUS
10.8%

Utilities

ESG
0.7%
BBUS
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESG vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESG
ESG Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ESG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ESG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESG Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESG vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.00

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.02

13.76

-0.74

ESG vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESG Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESG and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.33

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.79

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.84

-0.01

Drawdowns

ESG vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESG drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESG and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-35.35%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-9.21%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.32%

-19.01%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-25.46%

-0.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.74%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-5.46%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.00%

-0.01%

Volatility

ESG vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) have volatilities of 2.94% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

2.88%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.46%

8.96%

-0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.16%

11.87%

-0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.73%

17.03%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

19.59%

-1.23%

ESG vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESG has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESG vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

ESG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
0.87%0.96%1.18%1.10%1.38%1.03%1.33%1.51%1.72%1.52%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, ESG and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ESG has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESG dropped -32.53% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 12.73% for ESG. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 12.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ESG.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.87% for ESG.

ESG tracks STOXX USA ESG Select KPIs Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ESG and 0.02% for BBUS.

ESG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESG and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer