ESG.TO vs. USXF
ESG.TO (Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF) and USXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESG.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select Index, while USXF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESG.TO returned 16.77%/yr vs 19.01%/yr for USXF. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESG.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for USXF.
Performance
ESG.TO vs. USXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ESG.TO is traded in CAD, while USXF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the USXF values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESG.TO achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly lower than USXF's 22.30% return.
ESG.TO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 7.79%
- 1Y
- 29.42%
- 3Y*
- 21.78%
- 5Y*
- 16.77%
- 10Y*
- —
USXF
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 12.52%
- YTD
- 22.30%
- 6M
- 20.59%
- 1Y
- 36.96%
- 3Y*
- 28.86%
- 5Y*
- 19.01%
- 10Y*
- —
ESG.TO vs. USXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESG.TO Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF | 10.72% | 10.99% | 33.33% | 25.19% | -14.05% | 32.71% | 13.35% |
USXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF | 22.30% | 11.61% | 37.00% | 28.75% | -15.59% | 25.99% | 16.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESG.TO and USXF is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020 | 0.77 |
The correlation between ESG.TO and USXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESG.TO vs. USXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESG.TO
USXF
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
ESG.TO
USXF
Communication Services
ESG.TO
USXF
Financial Services
ESG.TO
USXF
Healthcare
ESG.TO
USXF
Industrials
ESG.TO
USXF
Consumer Defensive
ESG.TO
USXF
Consumer Cyclical
ESG.TO
USXF
Energy
ESG.TO
USXF
Real Estate
ESG.TO
USXF
Basic Materials
ESG.TO
USXF
Utilities
ESG.TO
USXF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESG.TO vs. USXF — Risk / Return Rank
ESG.TO
USXF
ESG.TO vs. USXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.TO) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF (USXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESG.TO | USXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.42 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 3.74 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | 12.83 | -1.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESG.TO | USXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 2.33 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.13 | 1.08 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 1.16 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
ESG.TO vs. USXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESG.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.31%, smaller than the maximum USXF drawdown of -26.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESG.TO and USXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESG.TO | USXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.31% | -26.38% | +4.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.69% | -9.93% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.85% | -21.58% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.31% | -26.38% | +4.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -0.10% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.30% | -5.55% | +1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 2.89% | -0.26% |
Volatility
ESG.TO vs. USXF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.TO) is 3.00%, while iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF (USXF) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that ESG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESG.TO | USXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 5.34% | -2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.36% | 12.69% | -3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.04% | 15.96% | -3.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.98% | 17.73% | -2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 17.38% | -1.04% |
ESG.TO vs. USXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESG.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than USXF's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESG.TO vs. USXF - Dividend Comparison
ESG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than USXF's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESG.TO Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF | 0.76% | 0.85% | 0.92% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.11% | 0.95% |
USXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF | 0.80% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.86% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESG.TO and USXF have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USXF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USXF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ESG.TO.
ESG.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while USXF is Large Cap Growth Equities. ESG.TO tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select Index, while USXF tracks MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ESG.TO and 0.10% for USXF.
Find the right allocation for ESG.TO and USXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer