ESG.TO vs. USCC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO).
ESG.TO and USCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ESG.TO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select Index. It was launched on Mar 5, 2020. USCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Sep 13, 2011.
Performance
ESG.TO vs. USCC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ESG.TO vs. USCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESG.TO Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF | -3.46% | 10.99% | 33.33% | 25.19% | -14.05% | 32.71% | 19.30% |
USCC.TO Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | -2.45% | 9.20% | 31.13% | 13.91% | -10.22% | 20.61% | 16.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESG.TO achieves a -3.46% return, which is significantly lower than USCC.TO's -2.45% return.
ESG.TO
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- -3.46%
- 6M
- -2.19%
- 1Y
- 14.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.23%
- 5Y*
- 14.03%
- 10Y*
- —
USCC.TO
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- YTD
- -2.45%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- 1Y
- 10.07%
- 3Y*
- 14.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ESG.TO vs. USCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESG.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than USCC.TO's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ESG.TO vs. USCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ESG.TO
USCC.TO
ESG.TO vs. USCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESG.TO | USCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 0.62 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.19 | 0.96 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.16 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 0.94 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.97 | 3.94 | +0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESG.TO | USCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.62 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.79 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.87 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between ESG.TO and USCC.TO is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ESG.TO vs. USCC.TO - Dividend Comparison
ESG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than USCC.TO's 9.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESG.TO Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF | 0.87% | 0.85% | 0.92% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.11% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USCC.TO Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 9.61% | 10.20% | 9.65% | 8.50% | 7.94% | 4.02% | 3.85% | 3.89% | 4.76% | 4.29% | 4.68% | 4.78% |
Drawdowns
ESG.TO vs. USCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESG.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.31%, smaller than the maximum USCC.TO drawdown of -28.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESG.TO and USCC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESG.TO | USCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.31% | -28.48% | +6.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.02% | -11.92% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.31% | -17.55% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.93% | -5.05% | -1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.39% | -3.51% | -0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 2.86% | +0.71% |
Volatility
ESG.TO vs. USCC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO) at 4.59%. This indicates that ESG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ESG.TO | USCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 4.59% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.59% | 7.71% | +1.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.52% | 16.30% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.98% | 15.15% | -0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 17.40% | -0.95% |