PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESE vs. SEI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ESE vs. SEI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ESCO Technologies Inc. (ESE) and Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ESE having a 60.68% return and SEI slightly higher at 61.67%.


ESE

1D
-0.69%
1M
4.49%
YTD
60.68%
6M
53.77%
1Y
68.53%
3Y*
47.58%
5Y*
28.75%
10Y*
23.22%

SEI

1D
-2.67%
1M
-3.95%
YTD
61.67%
6M
61.32%
1Y
167.96%
3Y*
112.03%
5Y*
53.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESE vs. SEI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESE
ESCO Technologies Inc.
60.68%46.96%14.15%34.13%-2.30%-12.59%12.01%41.00%10.04%4.97%
SEI
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc
61.67%62.29%277.66%-15.75%57.46%-15.55%-38.09%19.10%-43.06%75.35%

Correlation

The correlation between ESE and SEI is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2017

0.31

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ESE:

$8.13B

SEI:

$3.66B

EPS

ESE:

$11.89

SEI:

$1.03

PE Ratio

ESE:

26.38

SEI:

72.19

PS Ratio

ESE:

6.51

SEI:

4.83

PB Ratio

ESE:

5.07

SEI:

4.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

ESE:

$1.25B

SEI:

$692.11M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ESE:

$271.43M

SEI:

$235.28M

EBITDA (TTM)

ESE:

$238.72M

SEI:

$249.65M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESE vs. SEI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESE
ESE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ESE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ESE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SEI
SEI Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEI Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEI Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESE vs. SEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ESCO Technologies Inc. (ESE) and Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESESEIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

6.39

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.86

16.09

-4.24

ESE vs. SEI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESE Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the SEI Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESE and SEI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESE vs. SEI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESE drawdown since its inception was -58.54%, smaller than the maximum SEI drawdown of -79.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESE and SEI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESESEIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.54%

-79.49%

+20.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.22%

-26.43%

+11.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.52%

-55.37%

+37.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.88%

-55.37%

+18.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.55%

-5.65%

-1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.25%

-38.61%

+18.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.80%

10.48%

-4.68%

Volatility

ESE vs. SEI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ESCO Technologies Inc. (ESE) is 8.56%, while Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) has a volatility of 21.30%. This indicates that ESE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESESEIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.56%

21.30%

-12.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.29%

53.09%

-27.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.04%

73.22%

-42.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.40%

66.77%

-36.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.53%

62.28%

-31.75%

Dividends

ESE vs. SEI - Dividend Comparison

ESE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than SEI's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESE
ESCO Technologies Inc.
0.10%0.16%0.24%0.27%0.37%0.27%0.31%0.43%0.49%0.40%0.56%0.89%
SEI
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc
0.65%1.04%1.67%5.65%4.23%6.41%5.16%2.89%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ESE vs. SEI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ESCO Technologies Inc. and Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
309.34M
196.24M
(ESE) Total Revenue
(SEI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ESE vs. SEI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ESCO Technologies Inc. and Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
-38.8%
37.1%
Portfolio components
ESE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ESCO Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of -119.92M and revenue of 309.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -38.8%.

SEI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported a gross profit of 72.72M and revenue of 196.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.

ESE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ESCO Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 23.86M and revenue of 309.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.

SEI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported an operating income of 50.56M and revenue of 196.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.8%.

ESE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ESCO Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 34.73M and revenue of 309.34M, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.

SEI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported a net income of 21.44M and revenue of 196.24M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ESE and SEI have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEI has higher volatility (21.30%) compared to ESE (8.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESE dropped -58.54% vs SEI's -79.49%.

SEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESE and SEI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer