ESBG vs. QQWZ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ESBG (First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF) and QQWZ (Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESBG is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by First Trust, while QQWZ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Pacer. Both are actively managed. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ESBG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for QQWZ.

Performance

ESBG vs. QQWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESBG achieves a -2.79% return, which is significantly lower than QQWZ's 10.12% return.

ESBG

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: -2.07%
• 6M: -11.15%
• YTD: -2.79%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

QQWZ

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -3.49%
• 6M: 5.62%
• YTD: 10.12%
• 1Y: 21.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 30.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF	$3.83K	$6.10K	$15.77K
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	$172.82K	$316.10K	$312.95K

ESBG vs. QQWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF	-2.79%	5.67%
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	10.12%	2.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ESBG and QQWZ is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

ESBG vs. QQWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ESBG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQWZ

QQWZ Risk / Return Rank: 47
QQWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
QQWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
QQWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
QQWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
QQWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ESBG vs. QQWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ESBG	QQWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.11	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.58	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.20	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.68	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.42	—

Drawdowns

ESBG vs. QQWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESBG drawdown since its inception was -18.84%, which is greater than QQWZ's maximum drawdown of -11.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESBG and QQWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESBG	QQWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.84%	-11.30%	-7.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.57%	-7.62%	-9.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.52%	-1.78%	-6.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.96%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ESBG	QQWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.85%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.26%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.17%	17.20%	+7.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.17%	16.63%	+8.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.17%	16.63%	+8.54%

ESBG vs. QQWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESBG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESBG vs. QQWZ - Dividend Comparison

ESBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than QQWZ's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF	1.12%	0.24%
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	0.59%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESBG and QQWZ in my portfolio?

ESBG and QQWZ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ESBG or QQWZ?

On fees, QQWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESBG or QQWZ?

QQWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ESBG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESBG or QQWZ?

ESBG has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.59% for QQWZ.

What is the main difference between ESBG and QQWZ?

ESBG is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while QQWZ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ESBG and 0.49% for QQWZ.