PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESBG vs. NFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESBG vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESBG achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -8.94% return.


ESBG

1D
0.79%
1M
1.11%
YTD
5.96%
6M
7.17%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NFTY

1D
0.84%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
-8.94%
6M
-7.97%
1Y
-7.39%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
8.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESBG vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ESBG and NFTY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESBG vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESBG

NFTY
NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESBG vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ESBG vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESBGNFTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.28

+0.67

Drawdowns

ESBG vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESBG drawdown since its inception was -18.84%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESBG and NFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESBGNFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.84%

-47.67%

+28.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.14%

-16.76%

+6.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-9.58%

+3.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.16%

Volatility

ESBG vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESBGNFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.19%

14.73%

+10.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.19%

17.38%

+7.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.19%

20.71%

+4.48%

ESBG vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESBG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESBG vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

ESBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than NFTY's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESBG
First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF
0.57%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
1.94%1.24%1.61%0.13%5.89%1.53%0.61%0.97%0.00%4.10%3.28%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESBG and NFTY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ESBG.

NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.57% for ESBG.

ESBG is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ESBG and 0.80% for NFTY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESBG and NFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer