PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESBG vs. MDST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESBG vs. MDST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF (MDST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESBG achieves a -2.05% return, which is significantly lower than MDST's 16.53% return.


ESBG

1D
-1.81%
1M
-7.19%
YTD
-2.05%
6M
-5.44%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MDST

1D
1.73%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
16.53%
6M
16.66%
1Y
20.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESBG vs. MDST - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ESBG and MDST is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESBG vs. MDST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESBG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MDST
MDST Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MDST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDST Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDST Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
MDST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDST Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESBG vs. MDST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF (MDST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESBGMDSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.43

ESBG vs. MDST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESBG vs. MDST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESBG drawdown since its inception was -18.84%, which is greater than MDST's maximum drawdown of -14.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESBG and MDST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESBGMDSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.84%

-14.19%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.94%

-2.20%

-14.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.94%

-2.20%

-4.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

Volatility

ESBG vs. MDST - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESBGMDSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.28%

12.45%

+13.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.28%

16.11%

+10.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.28%

16.11%

+10.17%

ESBG vs. MDST - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESBG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MDST's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESBG vs. MDST - Dividend Comparison

ESBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than MDST's 9.20% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ESBG and MDST have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MDST is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MDST is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ESBG.

MDST has the higher dividend yield at 9.20%, compared with 0.62% for ESBG.

ESBG is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while MDST is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Westwood. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ESBG and 0.80% for MDST.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESBG and MDST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer