ESBG vs. HEFT
ESBG (First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF) and HEFT (Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESBG is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by First Trust, while HEFT is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Hedgeye. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESBG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for HEFT.
Performance
ESBG vs. HEFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESBG achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly lower than HEFT's 7.87% return.
ESBG
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 7.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEFT
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- 7.87%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESBG vs. HEFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | 5.96% | 6.45% |
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 7.87% | 0.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESBG and HEFT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESBG vs. HEFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESBG | HEFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 1.43 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
ESBG vs. HEFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESBG drawdown since its inception was -18.84%, which is greater than HEFT's maximum drawdown of -9.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESBG and HEFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESBG | HEFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -9.17% | -9.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.14% | -2.68% | -7.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -3.12% | -3.15% |
Volatility
ESBG vs. HEFT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESBG | HEFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.19% | 12.48% | +12.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 12.48% | +12.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 12.48% | +12.71% |
ESBG vs. HEFT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESBG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than HEFT's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESBG vs. HEFT - Dividend Comparison
ESBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than HEFT's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | 0.57% | 0.24% |
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESBG and HEFT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HEFT is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HEFT is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ESBG.
ESBG has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.02% for HEFT.
ESBG is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while HEFT is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Hedgeye. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ESBG and 0.70% for HEFT.
Find the right allocation for ESBG and HEFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer