ESBG vs. FTXL
ESBG (First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESBG is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by First Trust, while FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. ESBG is actively managed, while FTXL is passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESBG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXL.
Performance
ESBG vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESBG achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 110.86% return.
ESBG
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 7.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTXL
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- 21.46%
- YTD
- 110.86%
- 6M
- 111.07%
- 1Y
- 214.18%
- 3Y*
- 61.46%
- 5Y*
- 34.02%
- 10Y*
- —
ESBG vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | 5.96% | 5.72% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 110.86% | 10.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESBG and FTXL is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESBG vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
ESBG
FTXL
ESBG vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESBG | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 6.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.93 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
ESBG vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESBG drawdown since its inception was -18.84%, smaller than the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESBG and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESBG | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -43.87% | +25.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -41.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.14% | -2.24% | -7.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -10.55% | +4.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.88% | — |
Volatility
ESBG vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESBG | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.19% | 35.94% | -10.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 36.03% | -10.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 34.25% | -9.06% |
ESBG vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESBG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESBG vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
ESBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than FTXL's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | 0.57% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.13% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESBG and FTXL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ESBG.
ESBG has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.13% for FTXL.
ESBG is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while FTXL is Semiconductors. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ESBG and 0.60% for FTXL.
Find the right allocation for ESBG and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer