ESBG vs. AIRR
ESBG (First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF) and AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESBG is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by First Trust, while AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance (TR). ESBG is actively managed, while AIRR is passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESBG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for AIRR.
Performance
ESBG vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESBG achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 31.77% return.
ESBG
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 5.13%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIRR
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 31.77%
- 6M
- 31.32%
- 1Y
- 65.82%
- 3Y*
- 37.10%
- 5Y*
- 25.40%
- 10Y*
- 21.89%
ESBG vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | 5.13% | 5.72% |
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 31.77% | 5.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESBG and AIRR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESBG vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank
ESBG
AIRR
ESBG vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESBG | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.67 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
ESBG vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESBG drawdown since its inception was -18.84%, smaller than the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESBG and AIRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESBG | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -42.37% | +23.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.85% | -1.86% | -8.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -7.43% | +1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.53% | — |
Volatility
ESBG vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESBG | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.27% | 25.40% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.27% | 25.29% | -0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.27% | 26.29% | -1.02% |
ESBG vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESBG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AIRR's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESBG vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison
ESBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, more than AIRR's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | 0.58% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESBG and AIRR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIRR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIRR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ESBG.
ESBG has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.
ESBG is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while AIRR is Building & Construction. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ESBG and 0.70% for AIRR.
Find the right allocation for ESBG and AIRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer