PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ES6Y.DE vs. XCTE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ES6Y.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ES6Y.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ES6Y.DE achieves a 65.40% return, which is significantly higher than XCTE.DE's -0.10% return.


ES6Y.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
7.68%
6M
65.54%
YTD
65.40%
1Y
58.88%
3Y*
33.79%
5Y*
10Y*

XCTE.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.53%
6M
-5.10%
YTD
-0.10%
1Y
15.82%
3Y*
7.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ES6Y.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ES6Y.DE
L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
65.40%-9.21%34.05%51.62%-18.62%
XCTE.DE
Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C
-0.10%19.05%22.69%-18.15%-14.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ES6Y.DE and XCTE.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2022

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ES6Y.DE vs. XCTE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ES6Y.DE
ES6Y.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ES6Y.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ES6Y.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ES6Y.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ES6Y.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ES6Y.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

XCTE.DE
XCTE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XCTE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCTE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCTE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
XCTE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCTE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ES6Y.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ES6Y.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ES6Y.DEXCTE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.13

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

0.68

+3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.46

1.09

+8.37

ES6Y.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ES6Y.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the XCTE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ES6Y.DE and XCTE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ES6Y.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ES6Y.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, smaller than the maximum XCTE.DE drawdown of -48.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ES6Y.DE and XCTE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ES6Y.DEXCTE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.72%

-48.80%

+14.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.05%

-23.30%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.72%

-31.31%

-3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-17.65%

+17.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.36%

-25.47%

+16.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.24%

14.53%

-8.29%

Volatility

ES6Y.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ES6Y.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.06% compared to Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.DE) at 7.78%. This indicates that ES6Y.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCTE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ES6Y.DEXCTE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.06%

7.78%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.58%

16.46%

+7.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.38%

30.99%

-2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.03%

30.26%

-3.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.03%

30.26%

-3.23%

ES6Y.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ES6Y.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XCTE.DE's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

ES6Y.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ES6Y.DE nor XCTE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ES6Y.DE and XCTE.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCTE.DE is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCTE.DE is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ES6Y.DE.

ES6Y.DE tracks Solactive Emerging Cyber Security, while XCTE.DE tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ES6Y.DE and 0.44% for XCTE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ES6Y.DE and XCTE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer