PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ES vs. DOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ES vs. DOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eversource Energy (ES) and Physicians Realty Trust (DOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ES achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly lower than DOC's 32.47% return. Over the past 10 years, ES has outperformed DOC with an annualized return of 5.44%, while DOC has yielded a comparatively lower 0.15% annualized return.


ES

1D
0.38%
1M
3.48%
YTD
4.32%
6M
4.28%
1Y
10.16%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
5.44%

DOC

1D
0.93%
1M
7.43%
YTD
32.47%
6M
28.97%
1Y
27.61%
3Y*
6.30%
5Y*
-4.81%
10Y*
0.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ES vs. DOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ES
Eversource Energy
4.32%22.86%-2.46%-23.43%-5.06%8.18%4.45%34.49%6.41%17.97%
DOC
Physicians Realty Trust
32.47%-15.17%8.79%-16.40%-27.53%23.74%-7.69%29.16%13.69%-7.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ES and DOC is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987

0.29

The correlation between ES and DOC shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ES:

$25.87B

DOC:

$14.38B

EPS

ES:

$4.68

DOC:

$0.32

PE Ratio

ES:

14.67

DOC:

64.84

PS Ratio

ES:

1.84

DOC:

5.01

PB Ratio

ES:

0.00

DOC:

1.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

ES:

$13.93B

DOC:

$2.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ES:

$4.19B

DOC:

$609.74M

EBITDA (TTM)

ES:

$4.60B

DOC:

$1.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ES vs. DOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ES
ES Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ES Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
ES Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ES Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ES Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

DOC
DOC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ES vs. DOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eversource Energy (ES) and Physicians Realty Trust (DOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESDOCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.21

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

1.57

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.46

3.28

-1.82

ES vs. DOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ES Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the DOC Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ES and DOC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ES vs. DOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ES drawdown since its inception was -73.04%, which is greater than DOC's maximum drawdown of -61.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ES and DOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESDOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.04%

-61.03%

-12.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.13%

-17.09%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.65%

-29.00%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.69%

-54.07%

+12.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.69%

-54.07%

+12.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.32%

-27.23%

+13.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.06%

-14.83%

-4.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.30%

8.17%

-1.87%

Volatility

ES vs. DOC - Volatility Comparison

Eversource Energy (ES) has a higher volatility of 7.72% compared to Physicians Realty Trust (DOC) at 7.06%. This indicates that ES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESDOCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.72%

7.06%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.00%

23.28%

-7.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.68%

29.49%

-4.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.94%

26.35%

-2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.35%

29.63%

-5.28%

Dividends

ES vs. DOC - Dividend Comparison

ES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than DOC's 5.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DOC
Physicians Realty Trust
5.90%7.59%5.92%6.06%4.79%3.33%4.90%4.29%5.30%5.67%7.05%5.91%
ES
Eversource Energy
4.48%4.47%4.98%4.37%3.04%2.65%2.62%2.52%3.11%3.01%3.22%3.27%

Financials

ES vs. DOC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eversource Energy and Physicians Realty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
4.50B
752.95M
(ES) Total Revenue
(DOC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ES and DOC have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ES has higher volatility (7.72%) compared to DOC (7.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ES dropped -73.04% vs DOC's -61.03%.

DOC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ES and DOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer