PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERX vs. PXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERX vs. PXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERX achieves a 58.73% return, which is significantly higher than PXJ's 43.34% return. Over the past 10 years, ERX has underperformed PXJ with an annualized return of -9.50%, while PXJ has yielded a comparatively higher -0.54% annualized return.


ERX

1D
-3.72%
1M
15.60%
6M
14.96%
YTD
58.73%
1Y
73.31%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
33.57%
10Y*
-9.50%
ALL TIME*
-7.37%

PXJ

1D
-2.57%
1M
7.47%
6M
15.14%
YTD
43.34%
1Y
66.74%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
23.26%
10Y*
-0.54%
ALL TIME*
-1.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$23.06M$23.66M$27.73M
$672.12K$908.13K$1.86M

ERX vs. PXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
58.73%2.79%1.09%-12.26%130.58%111.91%-91.60%17.13%-55.94%-11.60%
PXJ
Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF
43.34%8.74%0.21%14.44%62.25%11.28%-44.31%-0.32%-39.82%-23.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ERX and PXJ is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008

0.87

The correlation between ERX and PXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ERX vs. PXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ERX
PXJ

Energy

100.0%
74.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

14.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

2.1%

Energy

ERX
100.0%
PXJ
74.8%

Basic Materials

ERX

-

PXJ

-

Communication Services

ERX

-

PXJ

-

Consumer Cyclical

ERX

-

PXJ

-

Consumer Defensive

ERX

-

PXJ

-

Financial Services

ERX

-

PXJ
0.2%

Healthcare

ERX

-

PXJ

-

Industrials

ERX

-

PXJ
14.7%

Real Estate

ERX

-

PXJ

-

Technology

ERX

-

PXJ

-

Utilities

ERX

-

PXJ
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERX vs. PXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ERX
ERX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

PXJ
PXJ Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ERX vs. PXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ERXPXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.41

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

3.65

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.18

11.88

-5.70

ERX vs. PXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the PXJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERX and PXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ERX vs. PXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERX drawdown since its inception was -99.54%, roughly equal to the maximum PXJ drawdown of -94.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERX and PXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERXPXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.54%

-94.82%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.97%

-18.39%

-11.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.34%

-40.03%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.90%

-40.03%

-6.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.59%

-87.72%

-10.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.99%

-67.25%

-24.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.26%

-55.76%

-11.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.90%

5.65%

+6.25%

Volatility

ERX vs. PXJ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) has a higher volatility of 12.41% compared to Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) at 7.76%. This indicates that ERX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERXPXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.41%

7.76%

+4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.24%

19.35%

+13.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.40%

26.16%

+16.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.46%

34.06%

+17.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.84%

39.16%

+29.68%

ERX vs. PXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than PXJ's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

ERX vs. PXJ - Dividend Comparison

ERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than PXJ's 2.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
1.61%2.54%2.94%3.17%2.23%2.16%2.35%1.56%3.10%0.85%0.00%0.00%
PXJ
Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF
2.43%2.91%3.34%1.99%0.65%2.40%4.72%1.87%0.99%2.75%1.18%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERX and PXJ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ERX has higher volatility (12.41%) compared to PXJ (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERX dropped -99.54% vs PXJ's -94.82%.

On 10-year performance, PXJ leads with -0.54% vs -9.50% for ERX. On fees, PXJ is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, PXJ has been the lower-risk option at 7.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PXJ has performed better with a -0.54% return vs -9.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PXJ is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for ERX.

PXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.43%, compared with 1.61% for ERX.

ERX tracks Energy Select Sector Index (200%), while PXJ tracks Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for ERX and 0.63% for PXJ.

PXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERX and PXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer