PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERNZ vs. OOSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERNZ vs. OOSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Active Yield ETF (ERNZ) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERNZ achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly higher than OOSP's 2.41% return.


ERNZ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
4.89%
6M
3.86%
1Y
2.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OOSP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.51%
YTD
2.41%
6M
2.82%
1Y
6.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERNZ vs. OOSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ERNZ
TrueShares Active Yield ETF
4.89%-6.50%3.43%
OOSP
Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF
2.41%7.41%6.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ERNZ and OOSP is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERNZ vs. OOSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERNZ
ERNZ Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ERNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

OOSP
OOSP Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
OOSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OOSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
OOSP Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
OOSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
OOSP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERNZ vs. OOSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Active Yield ETF (ERNZ) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ERNZOOSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.37

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

5.09

-4.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.60

18.85

-18.25

ERNZ vs. OOSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERNZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the OOSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERNZ and OOSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ERNZOOSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

1.80

-1.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

2.28

-2.23

Drawdowns

ERNZ vs. OOSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERNZ drawdown since its inception was -14.16%, which is greater than OOSP's maximum drawdown of -1.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERNZ and OOSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERNZOOSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.16%

-1.31%

-12.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.61%

-1.31%

-9.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.59%

-0.18%

-5.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-0.20%

-4.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.88%

0.35%

+4.53%

Volatility

ERNZ vs. OOSP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrueShares Active Yield ETF (ERNZ) is 0.00%, while Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) has a volatility of 1.17%. This indicates that ERNZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OOSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERNZOOSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

1.17%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.38%

2.23%

+2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.72%

3.71%

+6.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.76%

3.35%

+8.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.76%

3.35%

+8.41%

ERNZ vs. OOSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERNZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than OOSP's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

ERNZ vs. OOSP - Dividend Comparison

ERNZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, less than OOSP's 6.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ERNZ
TrueShares Active Yield ETF
6.37%9.90%5.51%
OOSP
Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF
6.47%6.71%5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERNZ and OOSP have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OOSP has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to ERNZ (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERNZ dropped -14.16% vs OOSP's -1.31%.

On 1-year performance, OOSP leads with 6.66% vs 2.92% for ERNZ. On fees, ERNZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ERNZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OOSP has performed better with a 6.66% return vs 2.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ERNZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for OOSP.

OOSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.47%, compared with 6.37% for ERNZ.

ERNZ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while OOSP is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Obra. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ERNZ and 0.90% for OOSP.

OOSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERNZ and OOSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer