PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ERNZ vs. PCEF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ERNZ and PCEF is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

ERNZ vs. PCEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Active Yield ETF (ERNZ) and Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.90%
7.11%
ERNZ
PCEF

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

ERNZ:

10.05%

PCEF:

8.24%

Max Drawdown

ERNZ:

-5.31%

PCEF:

-38.64%

Current Drawdown

ERNZ:

0.00%

PCEF:

-0.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERNZ achieves a 3.88% return, which is significantly lower than PCEF's 4.38% return.


ERNZ

YTD

3.88%

1M

1.64%

6M

4.38%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

PCEF

YTD

4.38%

1M

1.17%

6M

7.72%

1Y

17.63%

5Y*

4.94%

10Y*

6.29%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ERNZ vs. PCEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERNZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PCEF's 2.34% expense ratio.


PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
Expense ratio chart for PCEF: current value at 2.34% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.34%
Expense ratio chart for ERNZ: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ERNZ vs. PCEF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERNZ

PCEF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PCEF is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PCEF is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PCEF is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PCEF is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PCEF is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PCEF is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ERNZ vs. PCEF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Active Yield ETF (ERNZ) and Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
No data
ERNZ
PCEF


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

ERNZ vs. PCEF - Dividend Comparison

ERNZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, less than PCEF's 7.73% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ERNZ
TrueShares Active Yield ETF
5.85%5.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
7.73%8.79%9.85%8.93%6.67%7.55%7.12%8.21%6.96%7.12%9.18%8.03%

Drawdowns

ERNZ vs. PCEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERNZ drawdown since its inception was -5.31%, smaller than the maximum PCEF drawdown of -38.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERNZ and PCEF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February0
-0.15%
ERNZ
PCEF

Volatility

ERNZ vs. PCEF - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Active Yield ETF (ERNZ) has a higher volatility of 2.38% compared to Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) at 1.67%. This indicates that ERNZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.38%
1.67%
ERNZ
PCEF
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab