PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ERNZ vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


ERNZBDGS
Daily Std Dev11.28%6.57%
Max Drawdown-5.31%-5.38%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between ERNZ and BDGS is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

ERNZ vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%May 05May 12May 19May 26Jun 02Jun 09Jun 16Jun 23Jun 30Jul 07Jul 14Jul 21Jul 28Aug 04Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25SeptemberSep 08Sep 15
6.76%
10.37%
ERNZ
BDGS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ERNZ vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERNZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for ERNZ: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ERNZ vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Active Yield ETF (ERNZ) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ERNZ
Sharpe ratio
No data
BDGS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 2.94, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.94
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 4.91, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.91
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 1.90, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.90
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 3.60, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.60
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 22.76, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0022.76

ERNZ vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

ERNZ vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

ERNZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than BDGS's 0.74% yield.


TTM2023
ERNZ
TrueShares Active Yield ETF
2.28%0.00%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.74%0.84%

Drawdowns

ERNZ vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERNZ drawdown since its inception was -5.31%, roughly equal to the maximum BDGS drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERNZ and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%May 05May 12May 19May 26Jun 02Jun 09Jun 16Jun 23Jun 30Jul 07Jul 14Jul 21Jul 28Aug 04Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25SeptemberSep 08Sep 1500
ERNZ
BDGS

Volatility

ERNZ vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Active Yield ETF (ERNZ) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 0.69%. This indicates that ERNZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%Jun 02Jun 09Jun 16Jun 23Jun 30Jul 07Jul 14Jul 21Jul 28Aug 04Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25SeptemberSep 08Sep 15
2.91%
0.69%
ERNZ
BDGS