ERIC vs. EEM
ERIC (Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)) is a stock, while EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) is Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). Over the past 10 years, ERIC returned 5.47%/yr vs 8.30%/yr for EEM. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ERIC vs. EEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERIC achieves a 3.95% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 17.94% return. Over the past 10 years, ERIC has underperformed EEM with an annualized return of 5.47%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.30% annualized return.
ERIC
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -15.83%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- YTD
- 3.95%
- 1Y
- 38.68%
- 3Y*
- 31.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.16%
- 10Y*
- 5.47%
EEM
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- -6.48%
- 6M
- 11.07%
- YTD
- 17.94%
- 1Y
- 33.81%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 6.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.30%
ERIC vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 3.95% | 24.14% | 33.36% | 13.40% | -44.43% | -7.26% | 38.51% | 0.17% | 35.45% | 16.57% |
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 17.94% | 33.98% | 6.49% | 8.95% | -20.56% | -3.63% | 17.02% | 18.22% | -15.31% | 37.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ERIC and EEM is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2003 | 0.53 |
The correlation between ERIC and EEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ERIC vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank
ERIC
EEM
ERIC vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ERIC | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.28 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 2.51 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.38 | 8.34 | -2.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ERIC vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERIC drawdown since its inception was -98.59%, which is greater than EEM's maximum drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERIC and EEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERIC | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.59% | -66.43% | -32.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.02% | -13.52% | -14.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.02% | -17.29% | -10.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.82% | -35.20% | -27.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.59% | -39.82% | -26.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.92% | -9.86% | -76.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -15.96% | -51.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.21% | 4.06% | +3.15% |
Volatility
ERIC vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC) has a higher volatility of 17.52% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) at 10.05%. This indicates that ERIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ERIC | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.52% | 10.05% | +7.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.70% | 21.69% | +8.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.71% | 23.69% | +15.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.06% | 19.75% | +15.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.46% | 20.71% | +14.75% |
Dividends
ERIC vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison
ERIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, more than EEM's 1.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 1.74% | 2.22% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% |
ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 3.16% | 3.04% | 3.22% | 4.07% | 4.22% | 2.15% | 1.36% | 1.24% | 1.42% | 1.67% | 5.14% | 5.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ERIC and EEM have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ERIC has higher volatility (17.52%) compared to EEM (10.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERIC dropped -98.59% vs EEM's -66.43%.
EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ERIC and EEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer