PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERBIX vs. GWOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERBIX vs. GWOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund (ERBIX) and GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERBIX achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly lower than GWOAX's 17.69% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ERBIX having a 11.83% annualized return and GWOAX not far ahead at 12.08%.


ERBIX

1D
2.49%
1M
-1.49%
6M
5.49%
YTD
8.92%
1Y
20.65%
3Y*
14.36%
5Y*
8.68%
10Y*
11.83%
ALL TIME*
11.19%

GWOAX

1D
1.65%
1M
2.23%
6M
11.87%
YTD
17.69%
1Y
35.41%
3Y*
18.71%
5Y*
11.65%
10Y*
12.08%
ALL TIME*
8.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ERBIX vs. GWOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERBIX
Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund
8.92%18.35%15.00%14.63%-14.75%17.75%16.49%36.69%-11.86%20.94%
GWOAX
GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund
17.69%28.37%6.14%22.49%-14.10%18.53%10.53%26.56%-12.95%25.63%

Correlation

The correlation between ERBIX and GWOAX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.92

The correlation between ERBIX and GWOAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERBIX vs. GWOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ERBIX
ERBIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
ERBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ERBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

GWOAX
GWOAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GWOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GWOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ERBIX vs. GWOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund (ERBIX) and GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ERBIXGWOAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.47

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

3.86

-2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.88

15.33

-7.44

ERBIX vs. GWOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the GWOAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERBIX and GWOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ERBIX vs. GWOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERBIX drawdown since its inception was -29.18%, smaller than the maximum GWOAX drawdown of -49.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERBIX and GWOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERBIXGWOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.18%

-49.84%

+20.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-8.78%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.49%

-16.11%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.32%

-26.21%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.18%

-35.28%

+6.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

0.00%

-2.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.46%

-8.93%

+4.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.21%

+0.21%

Volatility

ERBIX vs. GWOAX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund (ERBIX) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) at 3.27%. This indicates that ERBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERBIXGWOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

3.27%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.95%

10.21%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.28%

12.89%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.14%

15.23%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

16.39%

-0.03%

ERBIX vs. GWOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERBIX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than GWOAX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

ERBIX vs. GWOAX - Dividend Comparison

ERBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.66%, more than GWOAX's 5.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERBIX
Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund
16.66%18.14%4.12%8.82%5.97%13.08%2.63%16.82%5.93%5.78%3.59%2.32%
GWOAX
GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund
5.37%4.46%0.60%6.10%7.27%12.75%3.85%4.33%3.02%3.05%6.43%12.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ERBIX and GWOAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ERBIX has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to GWOAX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERBIX dropped -29.18% vs GWOAX's -49.84%.

GWOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERBIX and GWOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer