PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQX.TO vs. ^TNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EQX.TO vs. ^TNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX.TO) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EQX.TO vs. ^TNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQX.TO
Equinox Gold Corp.
7.82%166.44%12.42%45.37%-48.25%-35.00%31.83%95.88%-8.93%-38.46%
^TNX
Treasury Yield 10 Years
5.06%-13.14%28.45%-2.53%174.83%63.40%-53.02%-32.07%21.16%-7.94%
Different Trading Currencies

EQX.TO is traded in CAD, while ^TNX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^TNX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQX.TO achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly higher than ^TNX's 5.06% return. Over the past 10 years, EQX.TO has outperformed ^TNX with an annualized return of 30.98%, while ^TNX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.92% annualized return.


EQX.TO

1D
3.43%
1M
-18.82%
YTD
7.82%
6M
36.84%
1Y
115.98%
3Y*
44.18%
5Y*
14.67%
10Y*
30.98%

^TNX

1D
0.05%
1M
8.43%
YTD
5.06%
6M
4.89%
1Y
0.97%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
23.30%
10Y*
9.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQX.TO vs. ^TNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQX.TO
EQX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EQX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EQX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

^TNX
^TNX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
^TNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^TNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
^TNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
^TNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
^TNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQX.TO vs. ^TNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX.TO) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQX.TO^TNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.02

0.05

+1.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.47

0.21

+2.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.02

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

-0.12

+3.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.53

-0.20

+9.74

EQX.TO vs. ^TNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the ^TNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQX.TO and ^TNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQX.TO^TNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

0.05

+1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.69

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.21

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.07

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between EQX.TO and ^TNX is -0.16. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Drawdowns

EQX.TO vs. ^TNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQX.TO drawdown since its inception was -86.00%, roughly equal to the maximum ^TNX drawdown of -84.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQX.TO and ^TNX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EQX.TO^TNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.00%

-93.78%

+7.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.85%

-13.99%

-21.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.77%

-31.74%

-38.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.51%

-84.57%

+4.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.82%

-46.17%

+27.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.78%

-51.38%

+6.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.57%

8.39%

+3.18%

Volatility

EQX.TO vs. ^TNX - Volatility Comparison

Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX.TO) has a higher volatility of 22.51% compared to Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) at 6.30%. This indicates that EQX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^TNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EQX.TO^TNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.51%

6.30%

+16.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.77%

11.34%

+34.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.85%

19.20%

+38.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.27%

33.89%

+21.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

192.35%

48.45%

+143.90%