EQWL vs. TEQI
EQWL (Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF) and TEQI (T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQWL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 100 Equal Weight Index, while TEQI is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. EQWL is passively managed, while TEQI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EQWL returned 11.94%/yr vs 9.28%/yr for TEQI. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQWL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for TEQI.
Performance
EQWL vs. TEQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQWL achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly lower than TEQI's 11.01% return.
EQWL
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 6M
- 10.19%
- 1Y
- 22.95%
- 3Y*
- 20.06%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- 14.47%
TEQI
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- 11.01%
- 6M
- 12.75%
- 1Y
- 22.31%
- 3Y*
- 16.81%
- 5Y*
- 9.28%
- 10Y*
- —
EQWL vs. TEQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | 9.48% | 17.61% | 19.11% | 19.48% | -11.46% | 28.29% | 16.75% |
TEQI T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF | 11.01% | 13.36% | 13.14% | 9.64% | -3.33% | 26.25% | 18.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQWL and TEQI is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020 | 0.92 |
The correlation between EQWL and TEQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
EQWL vs. TEQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EQWL
TEQI
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
EQWL
TEQI
Financial Services
EQWL
TEQI
Healthcare
EQWL
TEQI
Industrials
EQWL
TEQI
Consumer Defensive
EQWL
TEQI
Consumer Cyclical
EQWL
TEQI
Communication Services
EQWL
TEQI
Energy
EQWL
TEQI
Utilities
EQWL
TEQI
Real Estate
EQWL
TEQI
Basic Materials
EQWL
TEQI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQWL vs. TEQI — Risk / Return Rank
EQWL
TEQI
EQWL vs. TEQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) and T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQWL | TEQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.38 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 3.10 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.52 | 11.09 | +1.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQWL | TEQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 2.12 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.64 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.99 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
EQWL vs. TEQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQWL drawdown since its inception was -49.36%, which is greater than TEQI's maximum drawdown of -17.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQWL and TEQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQWL | TEQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.36% | -17.82% | -31.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.76% | -7.23% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -14.85% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.99% | -17.82% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.27% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.70% | -3.53% | -3.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 2.02% | -0.18% |
Volatility
EQWL vs. TEQI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) is 2.61%, while T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that EQWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQWL | TEQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 2.75% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.69% | 7.69% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 10.56% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.98% | 14.62% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.79% | 15.12% | +1.67% |
EQWL vs. TEQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQWL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TEQI's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQWL vs. TEQI - Dividend Comparison
EQWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, which matches TEQI's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | 1.53% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.97% | 2.12% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 2.04% | 2.23% | 1.27% | 2.01% | 2.03% |
TEQI T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF | 1.53% | 1.71% | 1.86% | 2.12% | 2.32% | 3.03% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQWL and TEQI have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TEQI has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to EQWL (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQWL dropped -49.36% vs TEQI's -17.82%.
On 5-year performance, EQWL leads with 11.94% vs 9.28% for TEQI. On fees, EQWL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EQWL has been the lower-risk option at 2.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EQWL has performed better with a 11.94% return vs 9.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EQWL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for TEQI.
EQWL and TEQI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.53%.
EQWL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TEQI is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EQWL and 0.54% for TEQI.
EQWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQWL and TEQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer