EQRR vs. WNTR

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

EQRR (ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQRR is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. EQRR is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, EQRR returned 35.22% vs 120.64% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. EQRR charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

EQRR vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQRR achieves a 26.87% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 10.13% return.

EQRR

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -0.38%
• 6M: 23.09%
• YTD: 26.87%
• 1Y: 35.22%
• 3Y*: 19.63%
• 5Y*: 13.27%
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: 1.92%
• 1M: 18.08%
• 6M: 14.43%
• YTD: 10.13%
• 1Y: 120.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQRR vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF	26.87%	9.56%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	10.13%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between EQRR and WNTR is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.33

Return for Risk

EQRR vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQRR

EQRR Risk / Return Rank: 91
EQRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
EQRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
EQRR Omega Ratio Rank: 87
EQRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EQRR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 70
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 72
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQRR vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EQRR	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	2.26	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	2.47	+0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.34	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.15	2.84	+4.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.39	7.31	+16.09

EQRR vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQRR Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQRR and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EQRR vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQRR drawdown since its inception was -57.93%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQRR and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQRR	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.93%	-42.65%	-15.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.95%	-42.65%	+37.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.01%	-10.15%	+9.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.98%	-20.53%	+10.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.51%	16.58%	-15.07%

Volatility

EQRR vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) is 5.53%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.84%. This indicates that EQRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQRR	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.53%	18.84%	-13.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.98%	47.46%	-35.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.00%	53.83%	-38.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.36%	53.56%	-32.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.84%	53.56%	-28.72%

EQRR vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQRR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

EQRR vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

EQRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than WNTR's 102.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF	1.09%	1.70%	2.17%	2.77%	2.34%	1.71%	2.17%	2.05%	2.47%	0.69%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	102.14%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQRR and WNTR in my portfolio?

EQRR and WNTR have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EQRR or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (18.84%) compared to EQRR (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQRR dropped -57.93% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, EQRR or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 120.64% vs 35.22% for EQRR. On fees, EQRR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EQRR has been the lower-risk option at 5.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EQRR or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 120.64% return vs 35.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EQRR or WNTR?

EQRR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EQRR or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 102.14%, compared with 1.09% for EQRR.

What is the main difference between EQRR and WNTR?

EQRR is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EQRR and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EQRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.