EQRR vs. SIXL
EQRR (ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF) and SIXL (ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQRR is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index, while SIXL is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. EQRR is passively managed, while SIXL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EQRR returned 12.33%/yr vs 3.45%/yr for SIXL. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EQRR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SIXL.
Performance
EQRR vs. SIXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQRR achieves a 27.33% return, which is significantly higher than SIXL's 3.41% return.
EQRR
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 8.10%
- YTD
- 27.33%
- 6M
- 27.15%
- 1Y
- 41.70%
- 3Y*
- 22.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.33%
- 10Y*
- —
SIXL
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- 3.41%
- 6M
- 2.41%
- 1Y
- 3.64%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- —
EQRR vs. SIXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 27.33% | 15.49% | 7.69% | 9.19% | 2.20% | 36.11% | 40.01% |
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF | 3.41% | -0.61% | 14.13% | 2.38% | -7.49% | 20.00% | 18.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQRR and SIXL is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.56 |
The correlation between EQRR and SIXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.60 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EQRR vs. SIXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EQRR
SIXL
Technology
Energy
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
EQRR
SIXL
Energy
EQRR
SIXL
Financial Services
EQRR
SIXL
Communication Services
EQRR
SIXL
Consumer Cyclical
EQRR
SIXL
Industrials
EQRR
SIXL
Basic Materials
EQRR
-
SIXL
Consumer Defensive
EQRR
-
SIXL
Healthcare
EQRR
-
SIXL
Real Estate
EQRR
-
SIXL
Utilities
EQRR
-
SIXL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQRR vs. SIXL — Risk / Return Rank
EQRR
SIXL
EQRR vs. SIXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) and ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQRR | SIXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.07 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.47 | 0.56 | +7.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.54 | 1.58 | +29.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQRR | SIXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.11 | 0.38 | +2.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.29 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.63 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
EQRR vs. SIXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQRR drawdown since its inception was -57.93%, which is greater than SIXL's maximum drawdown of -16.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQRR and SIXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQRR | SIXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.93% | -16.08% | -41.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.95% | -6.52% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.75% | -11.65% | -6.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.75% | -16.08% | -5.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -6.04% | +5.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.08% | -4.57% | -5.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.33% | 2.31% | -0.98% |
Volatility
EQRR vs. SIXL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL) at 2.36%. This indicates that EQRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQRR | SIXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 2.36% | +2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.35% | 6.61% | +3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.50% | 9.50% | +4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 12.14% | +9.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 12.55% | +12.32% |
EQRR vs. SIXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQRR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXL's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQRR vs. SIXL - Dividend Comparison
EQRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than SIXL's 2.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 1.20% | 1.70% | 2.17% | 2.77% | 2.34% | 1.71% | 2.17% | 2.05% | 2.47% | 0.69% |
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF | 2.31% | 2.31% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.45% | 0.67% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQRR and SIXL have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EQRR has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to SIXL (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQRR dropped -57.93% vs SIXL's -16.08%.
On 5-year performance, EQRR leads with 12.33% vs 3.45% for SIXL. On fees, EQRR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SIXL has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EQRR has performed better with a 12.33% return vs 3.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EQRR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SIXL.
SIXL has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.20% for EQRR.
EQRR is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SIXL is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EQRR and 0.47% for SIXL.
EQRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQRR and SIXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer