PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQRR vs. NIXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQRR vs. NIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQRR achieves a 25.08% return, which is significantly higher than NIXT's 19.77% return.


EQRR

1D
1.05%
1M
0.83%
YTD
25.08%
6M
24.04%
1Y
38.38%
3Y*
21.06%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*

NIXT

1D
0.29%
1M
0.29%
YTD
19.77%
6M
17.60%
1Y
32.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQRR vs. NIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EQRR
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF
25.08%15.49%1.19%
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
19.77%4.94%4.60%

Correlation

The correlation between EQRR and NIXT is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024

0.68

The correlation between EQRR and NIXT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQRR vs. NIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQRR
EQRR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
EQRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQRR Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EQRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQRR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

NIXT
NIXT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
NIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQRR vs. NIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EQRRNIXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.26

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.79

2.82

+4.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.59

9.50

+17.10

EQRR vs. NIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQRR Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the NIXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQRR and NIXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQRR vs. NIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQRR drawdown since its inception was -57.93%, which is greater than NIXT's maximum drawdown of -27.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQRR and NIXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQRRNIXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.93%

-27.75%

-30.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.95%

-11.71%

+6.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-1.15%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.02%

-5.82%

-4.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

3.47%

-2.02%

Volatility

EQRR vs. NIXT - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) at 5.52%. This indicates that EQRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQRRNIXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.33%

5.52%

+1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

14.52%

-2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.64%

21.25%

-6.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.42%

23.17%

-1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.87%

23.17%

+1.70%

EQRR vs. NIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQRR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than NIXT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQRR vs. NIXT - Dividend Comparison

EQRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than NIXT's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQRR
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF
1.10%1.70%2.17%2.77%2.34%1.71%2.17%2.05%2.47%0.69%
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
1.33%1.64%1.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQRR and NIXT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EQRR has higher volatility (7.33%) compared to NIXT (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQRR dropped -57.93% vs NIXT's -27.75%.

On 1-year performance, EQRR leads with 38.38% vs 32.87% for NIXT. On fees, NIXT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, NIXT has been the lower-risk option at 5.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EQRR has performed better with a 38.38% return vs 32.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NIXT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQRR.

NIXT has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 1.10% for EQRR.

EQRR tracks Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index, while NIXT tracks Research Affiliates Deletions Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Research Affiliates. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EQRR and 0.09% for NIXT.

EQRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQRR and NIXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer