EQRR vs. BITO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EQRR (ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF) and BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQRR is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index, while BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. EQRR is passively managed, while BITO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EQRR returned 22.79%/yr vs 26.82%/yr for BITO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EQRR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BITO.

Performance

EQRR vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQRR achieves a 28.12% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -28.44% return.

EQRR

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 7.76%
• YTD: 28.12%
• 6M: 27.54%
• 1Y: 44.05%
• 3Y*: 22.79%
• 5Y*: 12.47%
• 10Y*: —

BITO

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: -22.52%
• YTD: -28.44%
• 6M: -32.46%
• 1Y: -41.98%
• 3Y*: 26.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQRR vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF	28.12%	15.49%	7.69%	9.19%	2.20%	-2.00%
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	-28.44%	-11.19%	104.45%	137.33%	-63.91%	-31.09%

Correlation

The correlation between EQRR and BITO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2021	0.29

EQRR vs. BITO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EQRR	BITO
Technology	32.1%	-
Energy	26.8%	-
Financial Services	20.5%	68.5%
Communication Services	11.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.8%	-
Industrials	4.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EQRR vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQRR

EQRR Risk / Return Rank: 93
EQRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
EQRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
EQRR Omega Ratio Rank: 91
EQRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EQRR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

BITO

BITO Risk / Return Rank: 2
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQRR vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQRR	BITO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.30	-0.97	+4.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.31	-1.39	+5.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	0.84	+0.75
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.94	-0.83	+9.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	33.32	-1.44	+34.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQRR vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQRR Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is higher than the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQRR and BITO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQRR	BITO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.30	-0.97	+4.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	-0.10	+0.53

Drawdowns

EQRR vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQRR drawdown since its inception was -57.93%, smaller than the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQRR and BITO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQRR	BITO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.93%	-77.86%	+19.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.95%	-50.64%	+45.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.75%	-50.64%	+32.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-50.64%	+50.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.07%	-36.75%	+26.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.33%	29.27%	-27.94%

Volatility

EQRR vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) is 4.69%, while ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a volatility of 9.03%. This indicates that EQRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQRR	BITO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.69%	9.03%	-4.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.36%	33.71%	-23.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.48%	43.61%	-30.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.39%	55.10%	-33.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.86%	55.10%	-30.24%

EQRR vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQRR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EQRR vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

EQRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than BITO's 69.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	69.59%	78.29%	61.59%	15.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF	1.20%	1.70%	2.17%	2.77%	2.34%	1.71%	2.17%	2.05%	2.47%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQRR and BITO in my portfolio?

EQRR and BITO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EQRR or BITO?

BITO has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to EQRR (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQRR dropped -57.93% vs BITO's -77.86%.

Which ETF is better, EQRR or BITO?

On 3-year performance, BITO leads with 26.82% vs 22.79% for EQRR. On fees, EQRR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EQRR has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EQRR or BITO?

Over the 3-year period, BITO has performed better with a 26.82% return vs 22.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EQRR or BITO?

EQRR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EQRR or BITO?

BITO has the higher dividend yield at 69.59%, compared with 1.20% for EQRR.

What is the main difference between EQRR and BITO?

EQRR is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while BITO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EQRR and 0.95% for BITO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EQRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.