PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQPGX vs. FSELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQPGX vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQPGX achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly lower than FSELX's 86.42% return. Over the past 10 years, EQPGX has underperformed FSELX with an annualized return of 19.07%, while FSELX has yielded a comparatively higher 39.28% annualized return.


EQPGX

1D
-1.01%
1M
5.59%
YTD
14.28%
6M
13.42%
1Y
28.97%
3Y*
24.86%
5Y*
14.41%
10Y*
19.07%

FSELX

1D
0.46%
1M
23.91%
YTD
86.42%
6M
84.56%
1Y
162.37%
3Y*
69.11%
5Y*
46.37%
10Y*
39.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQPGX vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQPGX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I
14.28%14.60%29.99%35.60%-24.45%22.94%43.80%34.01%0.17%35.19%
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
86.42%52.17%49.68%78.49%-35.27%59.16%44.33%64.50%-12.01%34.51%

Correlation

The correlation between EQPGX and FSELX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 1985

0.81

The correlation between EQPGX and FSELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQPGX vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQPGX
EQPGX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EQPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
EQPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FSELX
FSELX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FSELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSELX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FSELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQPGX vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQPGXFSELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.69

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

11.73

-9.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.02

45.05

-36.03

EQPGX vs. FSELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQPGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the FSELX Sharpe Ratio of 5.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQPGX and FSELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQPGXFSELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

5.17

-3.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

1.20

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

1.12

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.55

+0.07

Drawdowns

EQPGX vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQPGX drawdown since its inception was -62.00%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQPGX and FSELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQPGXFSELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.00%

-82.54%

+20.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.57%

-14.38%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.04%

-36.31%

+13.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.81%

-46.37%

+16.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.11%

-46.37%

+15.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

0.00%

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.75%

-28.70%

+14.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

3.74%

-0.44%

Volatility

EQPGX vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX) is 4.41%, while Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) has a volatility of 11.98%. This indicates that EQPGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQPGXFSELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

11.98%

-7.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.73%

25.42%

-12.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.32%

32.72%

-16.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.19%

38.96%

-18.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.55%

35.06%

-14.51%

EQPGX vs. FSELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQPGX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQPGX vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison

EQPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than FSELX's 8.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQPGX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I
0.46%0.52%10.64%0.48%1.96%11.42%10.84%8.56%6.43%11.57%5.90%2.21%
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
8.79%11.11%7.97%7.20%6.69%6.99%8.13%3.36%26.80%14.44%3.82%15.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQPGX and FSELX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSELX has higher volatility (11.98%) compared to EQPGX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQPGX dropped -62.00% vs FSELX's -82.54%.

FSELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.17 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQPGX and FSELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer