EQLT vs. TLT
EQLT (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQLT is a Quality Factor fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor Select Index, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EQLT returned 44.38% vs -2.45% for TLT. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EQLT charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
EQLT vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQLT achieves a 22.86% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -3.49% return.
EQLT
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- YTD
- 22.86%
- 1Y
- 44.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 29.13%
TLT
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- 6M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- -3.49%
- 1Y
- -2.45%
- 3Y*
- -1.80%
- 5Y*
- -8.18%
- 10Y*
- -2.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $77.09K | $55.23K | $122.39K | |
| $2.33B | $2.02B | $2.19B |
EQLT vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EQLT iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF | 22.86% | 33.93% | -1.29% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -3.49% | 4.25% | -11.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQLT and TLT is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQLT vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
EQLT
TLT
EQLT vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EQLT | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.99 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | -0.14 | +3.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.91 | -0.30 | +11.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EQLT vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQLT drawdown since its inception was -17.38%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQLT and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQLT | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.38% | -48.35% | +30.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.00% | -7.74% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.36% | -42.36% | +34.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.81% | -13.99% | +10.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 3.57% | +0.39% |
Volatility
EQLT vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 2.46%. This indicates that EQLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQLT | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 2.46% | +3.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.15% | 6.85% | +14.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.39% | 9.32% | +14.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 15.74% | +5.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 14.83% | +6.42% |
EQLT vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQLT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQLT vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
EQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than TLT's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQLT iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF | 2.85% | 3.10% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.34% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQLT and TLT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EQLT has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to TLT (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQLT dropped -17.38% vs TLT's -48.35%.
On 1-year performance, EQLT leads with 44.38% vs -2.45% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EQLT has performed better with a 44.38% return vs -2.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQLT.
TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 2.85% for EQLT.
EQLT is categorized as Quality Factor, while TLT is Government Bonds. EQLT tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor Select Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EQLT and 0.15% for TLT.
EQLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQLT and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer