PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQL vs. SAMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EQL vs. SAMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EQL vs. SAMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EQL
Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF
2.94%13.09%16.44%16.87%-5.63%
SAMT
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
1.97%33.10%28.15%1.27%-6.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQL achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly higher than SAMT's 1.97% return.


EQL

1D
1.81%
1M
-4.49%
YTD
2.94%
6M
4.25%
1Y
15.29%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
12.14%

SAMT

1D
2.00%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
1.97%
6M
6.10%
1Y
35.45%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EQL vs. SAMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than SAMT's 0.66% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EQL vs. SAMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQL
EQL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQL Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQL Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SAMT
SAMT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SAMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQL vs. SAMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQLSAMTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.03

2.01

-0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.50

2.65

-1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.36

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

4.10

-2.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.74

11.61

-4.87

EQL vs. SAMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQL Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the SAMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQL and SAMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQLSAMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

2.01

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.76

+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between EQL and SAMT is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EQL vs. SAMT - Dividend Comparison

EQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than SAMT's 0.69% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQL
Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF
1.71%1.73%1.78%1.96%2.14%1.69%2.29%1.95%2.39%1.97%2.89%2.07%
SAMT
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
0.69%0.70%1.40%1.49%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EQL vs. SAMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQL drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, which is greater than SAMT's maximum drawdown of -20.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQL and SAMT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EQLSAMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.65%

-20.57%

-15.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.90%

-8.76%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.49%

-5.78%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-8.00%

+4.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

3.10%

-0.70%

Volatility

EQL vs. SAMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) is 3.95%, while Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that EQL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EQLSAMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

4.97%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.32%

11.91%

-4.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.88%

17.68%

-2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.60%

16.78%

-2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

16.78%

-0.23%