EQL vs. VIG
EQL (ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EQL returned 12.49%/yr vs 13.25%/yr for VIG. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQL charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
EQL vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQL achieves a 9.00% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 7.77% return. Over the past 10 years, EQL has underperformed VIG with an annualized return of 12.49%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.25% annualized return.
EQL
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 9.87%
- 1Y
- 19.53%
- 3Y*
- 16.54%
- 5Y*
- 10.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
VIG
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 7.77%
- 6M
- 7.94%
- 1Y
- 20.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.25%
EQL vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | 9.00% | 13.09% | 16.44% | 16.87% | -10.72% | 29.32% | 10.87% | 27.87% | -6.12% | 18.37% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.77% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQL and VIG is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2009 | 0.92 |
The correlation between EQL and VIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
EQL vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EQL
VIG
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Technology
EQL
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
EQL
VIG
Real Estate
EQL
VIG
-
Communication Services
EQL
VIG
Utilities
EQL
VIG
Financial Services
EQL
VIG
Consumer Defensive
EQL
VIG
Industrials
EQL
VIG
Energy
EQL
VIG
Healthcare
EQL
VIG
Basic Materials
EQL
VIG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQL vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
EQL
VIG
EQL vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQL | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 2.07 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.96 | 3.01 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.37 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 2.67 | +0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.63 | 10.82 | +1.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQL | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.07 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.76 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.83 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.60 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
EQL vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQL drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQL and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQL | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.65% | -46.81% | +11.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.19% | -7.91% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.07% | -14.95% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.24% | -20.39% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.65% | -31.72% | -3.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | 0.00% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -5.52% | +2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 1.96% | -0.38% |
Volatility
EQL vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) have volatilities of 2.26% and 2.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQL | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 2.32% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.85% | 7.64% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.34% | 10.01% | -0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.55% | 14.23% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 16.05% | +0.49% |
EQL vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQL has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EQL vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
EQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than VIG's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 2.39% | 1.97% | 2.89% | 2.07% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.46% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQL and VIG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIG has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to EQL (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQL dropped -35.65% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.25% vs 12.49% for EQL. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.25% return vs 12.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for EQL.
EQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 1.46% for VIG.
EQL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VIG is Dividend. EQL tracks NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for EQL and 0.04% for VIG.
EQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQL and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer