EQCHX vs. DBMF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EQCHX (AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both Systematic Trend funds. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EQCHX charges 1.91%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.

Performance

EQCHX vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I (EQCHX) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EQCHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBMF

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 2.35%
• YTD: 12.42%
• 6M: 14.20%
• 1Y: 31.40%
• 3Y*: 10.81%
• 5Y*: 8.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQCHX vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EQCHX AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I	0.83%	-8.09%	-3.79%	-8.07%	20.13%	12.28%	6.96%	-3.43%
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	12.42%	13.85%	7.24%	-8.94%	21.61%	11.49%	1.80%	10.67%

Correlation

The correlation between EQCHX and DBMF is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019	0.57

The correlation between EQCHX and DBMF shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EQCHX vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 83
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQCHX vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I (EQCHX) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQCHX	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.77	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	EQCHX	DBMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-20.39%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.10%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-6.59%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.65%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EQCHX	DBMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.76%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	12.17%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	12.52%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	12.41%	—

EQCHX vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQCHX has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

EQCHX vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

EQCHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.09%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EQCHX AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I	0.00%	0.00%	0.62%	1.82%	1.54%	20.40%	0.00%	3.86%	1.18%	0.00%	0.00%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQCHX and DBMF in my portfolio?

EQCHX and DBMF have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.