PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQAL vs. PPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQAL vs. PPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQAL achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly higher than PPA's 8.54% return. Over the past 10 years, EQAL has underperformed PPA with an annualized return of 10.66%, while PPA has yielded a comparatively higher 17.38% annualized return.


EQAL

1D
-0.73%
1M
1.77%
YTD
12.35%
6M
12.78%
1Y
24.33%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
6.86%
10Y*
10.66%

PPA

1D
-1.74%
1M
3.19%
YTD
8.54%
6M
13.46%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
28.92%
5Y*
17.82%
10Y*
17.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQAL vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQAL
Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF
12.35%11.05%11.38%11.98%-13.49%23.14%16.57%24.54%-9.22%17.36%
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
8.54%37.15%25.28%18.41%9.52%7.09%0.45%39.63%-7.51%30.10%

Correlation

The correlation between EQAL and PPA is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2014

0.77

The correlation between EQAL and PPA shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EQAL vs. PPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQAL
PPA

Technology

14.8%
9.8%

Industrials

9.5%
90.1%

Financial Services

9.4%

-

Healthcare

9.4%

-

Energy

9.1%

-

Real Estate

9.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.1%

-

Basic Materials

8.0%

-

Utilities

7.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%

-

Communication Services

7.2%
0.1%

Technology

EQAL
14.8%
PPA
9.8%

Industrials

EQAL
9.5%
PPA
90.1%

Financial Services

EQAL
9.4%
PPA

-

Healthcare

EQAL
9.4%
PPA

-

Energy

EQAL
9.1%
PPA

-

Real Estate

EQAL
9.1%
PPA

-

Consumer Defensive

EQAL
8.1%
PPA

-

Basic Materials

EQAL
8.0%
PPA

-

Utilities

EQAL
7.9%
PPA

-

Consumer Cyclical

EQAL
7.7%
PPA

-

Communication Services

EQAL
7.2%
PPA
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQAL vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQAL
EQAL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EQAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
EQAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PPA
PPA Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQAL vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQALPPADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

1.40

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.85

2.05

+0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.24

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

1.95

+1.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.89

5.68

+7.20

EQAL vs. PPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the PPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQAL and PPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQALPPADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.40

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.97

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.84

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.66

-0.15

Drawdowns

EQAL vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQAL drawdown since its inception was -40.44%, smaller than the maximum PPA drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQAL and PPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQALPPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.44%

-57.37%

+16.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.67%

-13.71%

+7.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.62%

-15.24%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.79%

-18.37%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.44%

-43.92%

+3.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-8.40%

+7.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-9.18%

+4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

4.69%

-2.80%

Volatility

EQAL vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) is 3.05%, while Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that EQAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQALPPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

6.73%

-3.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

15.95%

-7.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.30%

19.03%

-6.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.28%

18.49%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.88%

20.64%

-1.76%

EQAL vs. PPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQAL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PPA's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQAL vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison

EQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than PPA's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQAL
Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF
1.64%1.79%1.62%1.88%1.95%1.32%1.63%1.61%1.62%1.18%1.57%1.64%
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.39%0.42%0.61%0.67%0.83%0.59%0.88%0.95%0.90%0.67%1.70%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQAL and PPA have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPA has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to EQAL (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQAL dropped -40.44% vs PPA's -57.37%.

On 10-year performance, PPA leads with 17.38% vs 10.66% for EQAL. On fees, EQAL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EQAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PPA has performed better with a 17.38% return vs 10.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EQAL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PPA.

EQAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.39% for PPA.

EQAL is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while PPA is Industrials Equities. EQAL tracks Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index, while PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EQAL and 0.61% for PPA.

EQAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQAL and PPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer