EPV vs. QTJL
EPV (ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EPV is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EPV returned -19.02%/yr vs 9.12%/yr for QTJL. Their -0.62 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EPV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
EPV vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPV achieves a -19.77% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 4.03% return.
EPV
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- 6M
- -10.92%
- YTD
- -19.77%
- 1Y
- -35.04%
- 3Y*
- -26.13%
- 5Y*
- -19.02%
- 10Y*
- -22.82%
- ALL TIME*
- -25.54%
QTJL
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- 4.03%
- 1Y
- 13.57%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $306.03K | $269.56K | $428.32K | |
| $205.17K | $322.53K | $250.53K |
EPV vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe | -19.77% | -45.21% | 2.02% | -30.81% | 15.53% | -9.03% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 4.03% | 21.07% | 16.50% | 42.39% | -30.16% | 9.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPV and QTJL is -0.58, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | -0.62 |
The correlation between EPV and QTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.62 to -0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPV vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
EPV
QTJL
EPV vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPV | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.24 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.05 | 1.61 | -2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.72 | 7.83 | -9.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPV vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPV drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPV and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPV | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.41% | -33.40% | -66.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.55% | -8.48% | -25.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.49% | -22.43% | -45.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.42% | -33.40% | -47.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.41% | -3.26% | -96.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.47% | -7.74% | -80.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.92% | 1.74% | +20.18% |
Volatility
EPV vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) has a higher volatility of 9.50% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 6.50%. This indicates that EPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPV | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.50% | 6.50% | +3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.44% | 9.72% | +18.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.47% | 11.73% | +20.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.99% | 20.45% | +15.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.90% | 20.30% | +16.60% |
EPV vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPV vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
EPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe | 4.98% | 4.80% | 4.83% | 3.17% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.09% | 1.10% | 0.19% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPV and QTJL have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPV has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to QTJL (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPV dropped -99.41% vs QTJL's -33.40%.
On 5-year performance, QTJL leads with 9.12% vs -19.02% for EPV. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 6.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 9.12% return vs -19.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EPV.
EPV has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EPV and 0.79% for QTJL.
QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPV and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer