EPU vs. RBIL
EPU (iShares MSCI Peru ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPU is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Peru Capped Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EPU returned 64.72% vs 4.56% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. EPU charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
EPU vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPU achieves a 8.58% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.63% return.
EPU
- 1D
- -6.28%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- YTD
- 8.58%
- 6M
- 17.68%
- 1Y
- 64.72%
- 3Y*
- 41.90%
- 5Y*
- 22.72%
- 10Y*
- 13.41%
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EPU vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 8.58% | 80.56% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.63% | 2.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPU and RBIL is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPU vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
EPU
RBIL
EPU vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPU | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 2.38 | -1.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 16.96 | -13.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.25 | 70.30 | -61.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPU | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 5.00 | -2.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 4.20 | -3.77 |
Drawdowns
EPU vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPU drawdown since its inception was -60.62%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPU and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPU | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.62% | -0.50% | -60.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.85% | -0.27% | -20.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.28% | -0.07% | -16.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.82% | -0.06% | -18.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.02% | 0.06% | +6.96% |
Volatility
EPU vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) has a higher volatility of 10.84% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.26%. This indicates that EPU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPU | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.84% | 0.26% | +10.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.85% | 0.80% | +25.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.03% | 0.92% | +29.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.20% | 1.05% | +24.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.51% | 1.05% | +22.46% |
EPU vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPU has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPU vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
EPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than RBIL's 4.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 1.50% | 1.63% | 5.78% | 4.17% | 5.56% | 3.13% | 1.91% | 2.67% | 1.53% | 3.30% | 0.85% | 1.90% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.60% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPU and RBIL have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPU has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to RBIL (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPU dropped -60.62% vs RBIL's -0.50%.
On 1-year performance, EPU leads with 64.72% vs 4.56% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EPU has performed better with a 64.72% return vs 4.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EPU.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 1.50% for EPU.
EPU is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. EPU tracks MSCI All Peru Capped Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EPU and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.00 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPU and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer