EPU vs. EWW
EPU (iShares MSCI Peru ETF) and EWW (iShares MSCI Mexico ETF) are both Latin America Equities funds from iShares - EPU tracks the MSCI All Peru Capped Index while EWW tracks the MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPU returned 13.22%/yr vs 7.35%/yr for EWW. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EPU charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWW.
Performance
EPU vs. EWW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPU achieves a 20.80% return, which is significantly higher than EWW's 12.42% return. Over the past 10 years, EPU has outperformed EWW with an annualized return of 13.22%, while EWW has yielded a comparatively lower 7.35% annualized return.
EPU
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 2.20%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 20.80%
- 1Y
- 81.51%
- 3Y*
- 42.19%
- 5Y*
- 31.75%
- 10Y*
- 13.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.65%
EWW
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 1Y
- 33.28%
- 3Y*
- 10.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.01%
- 10Y*
- 7.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.01M | $4.02M | $5.98M | |
| $76.09M | $75.24M | $92.91M |
EPU vs. EWW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 20.80% | 86.87% | 21.73% | 25.34% | 2.05% | -11.81% | -4.31% | 7.30% | -12.17% | 29.70% |
EWW iShares MSCI Mexico ETF | 12.42% | 53.65% | -28.22% | 40.32% | 1.24% | 20.27% | -3.06% | 12.64% | -14.58% | 14.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPU and EWW is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2009 | 0.54 |
The correlation between EPU and EWW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
EPU vs. EWW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPU
EWW
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Industrials
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
-
-
Technology
-
-
Basic Materials
EPU
EWW
Financial Services
EPU
EWW
Consumer Cyclical
EPU
EWW
Consumer Defensive
EPU
EWW
Real Estate
EPU
EWW
Industrials
EPU
EWW
Utilities
EPU
EWW
-
Communication Services
EPU
EWW
Healthcare
EPU
EWW
Energy
EPU
-
EWW
-
Technology
EPU
-
EWW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPU vs. EWW — Risk / Return Rank
EPU
EWW
EPU vs. EWW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) and iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPU | EWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.26 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 2.30 | +1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.45 | 7.47 | +2.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPU vs. EWW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPU drawdown since its inception was -60.62%, smaller than the maximum EWW drawdown of -64.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPU and EWW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPU | EWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.62% | -64.94% | +4.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.85% | -13.98% | -6.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.85% | -31.17% | +10.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.59% | -31.17% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.97% | -53.62% | +2.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.86% | -4.05% | -2.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.72% | -18.45% | -0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.72% | 4.31% | +3.41% |
Volatility
EPU vs. EWW - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) at 5.24%. This indicates that EPU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPU | EWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 5.24% | +3.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.47% | 18.57% | +8.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.03% | 22.04% | +9.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.09% | 22.58% | +2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.71% | 25.25% | -1.54% |
EPU vs. EWW - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPU has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EWW's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPU vs. EWW - Dividend Comparison
EPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than EWW's 3.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 1.98% | 1.63% | 5.78% | 4.17% | 5.56% | 3.13% | 1.91% | 2.67% | 1.53% | 3.30% | 0.85% | 1.90% |
EWW iShares MSCI Mexico ETF | 3.21% | 3.48% | 4.39% | 2.19% | 3.64% | 2.06% | 1.43% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 2.22% | 1.77% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPU and EWW have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPU has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to EWW (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPU dropped -60.62% vs EWW's -64.94%.
On 10-year performance, EPU leads with 13.22% vs 7.35% for EWW. On fees, EWW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWW has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EPU has performed better with a 13.22% return vs 7.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EPU.
EWW has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 1.98% for EPU.
EPU tracks MSCI All Peru Capped Index, while EWW tracks MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EPU and 0.50% for EWW.
EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPU and EWW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer