PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EPU vs. EWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EPU vs. EWO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EPU (iShares MSCI Peru ETF) and EWO (iShares MSCI Austria ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPU is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Peru Capped Index, while EWO is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Austria Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPU returned 15.16%/yr vs 15.10%/yr for EWO. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPU charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWO.

Performance

EPU vs. EWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) and iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPU achieves a 21.02% return, which is significantly higher than EWO's 18.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EPU having a 15.16% annualized return and EWO not far behind at 15.10%.

EPU

1D
2.12%
1M
4.37%
YTD
21.02%
6M
26.87%
1Y
85.51%
3Y*
46.38%
5Y*
28.15%
10Y*
15.16%

EWO

1D
1.37%
1M
6.75%
YTD
18.55%
6M
23.71%
1Y
48.35%
3Y*
33.19%
5Y*
15.56%
10Y*
15.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPU vs. EWO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF		21.02%86.87%21.73%25.34%2.05%-11.81%-4.31%7.30%-12.17%29.70%
EWO
iShares MSCI Austria ETF		18.55%74.21%4.05%20.63%-21.95%31.50%-3.67%17.05%-22.88%52.47%

Correlation

The correlation between EPU and EWO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2009

0.52

The correlation between EPU and EWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPU vs. EWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EPU
EWO

Basic Materials

52.7%
10.5%

Financial Services

28.8%
46.5%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%
1.7%

Real Estate

3.2%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%

-

Utilities

2.8%
6.4%

Industrials

2.8%
14.3%

Communication Services

1.6%

-

Healthcare

1.2%

-

Energy

-

9.5%

Technology

-

5.6%

Basic Materials

EPU
52.7%
EWO
10.5%

Financial Services

EPU
28.8%
EWO
46.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EPU
4.1%
EWO
1.7%

Real Estate

EPU
3.2%
EWO
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

EPU
3.0%
EWO

-

Utilities

EPU
2.8%
EWO
6.4%

Industrials

EPU
2.8%
EWO
14.3%

Communication Services

EPU
1.6%
EWO

-

Healthcare

EPU
1.2%
EWO

-

Energy

EPU

-

EWO
9.5%

Technology

EPU

-

EWO
5.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Peru ETF

iShares MSCI Austria ETF

Often compared with EPU:
EPU vs. ECHEPU vs. ILFEPU vs. ARGTEPU vs. EISEPU vs. EVXEPU vs. EWSEPU vs. EPI
Often compared with EWO:
EWO vs. EWAEWO vs. EWQEWO vs. EWLEWO vs. IBZL.LEWO vs. EEMEWO vs. EWGEWO vs. VOO

Return for Risk

EPU vs. EWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EPU
EPU Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPU Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPU Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
EWO
EWO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPU vs. EWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) and iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EPUEWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.73
2.41

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.14
3.35

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.41

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

3.28

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.73

11.10

+0.64

EPU vs. EWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPU Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the EWO Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPU and EWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EPU vs. EWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPU drawdown since its inception was -60.62%, smaller than the maximum EWO drawdown of -75.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPU and EWO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EPUEWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.62%

-75.69%

+15.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.85%

-14.08%

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.85%

-16.75%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.59%

-41.82%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.97%

-58.10%

+7.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.69%

0.00%

-6.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.81%

-28.10%

+9.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.22%

4.16%

+3.06%

Volatility

EPU vs. EWO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) has a higher volatility of 13.52% compared to iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) at 7.31%. This indicates that EPU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EPUEWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.52%

7.31%

+6.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.94%

15.88%

+11.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.04%

19.19%

+11.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.11%

21.95%

+3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.64%

22.88%

+0.76%

EPU vs. EWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPU has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EWO's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPU vs. EWO - Dividend Comparison

EPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than EWO's 2.01% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF		1.35%1.63%5.78%4.17%5.56%3.13%1.91%2.67%1.53%3.30%0.85%1.90%
EWO
iShares MSCI Austria ETF		2.01%2.38%7.40%5.66%4.75%2.42%0.98%3.11%4.04%2.03%1.99%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

EPU and EWO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPU has higher volatility (13.52%) compared to EWO (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPU dropped -60.62% vs EWO's -75.69%.

On 10-year performance, EPU leads with 15.16% vs 15.10% for EWO. On fees, EWO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWO has been the lower-risk option at 7.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EPU has performed better with a 15.16% return vs 15.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EPU.

EWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 1.35% for EPU.

EPU is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while EWO is Europe Equities. EPU tracks MSCI All Peru Capped Index, while EWO tracks MSCI Austria Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EPU and 0.49% for EWO.

EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPU and EWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer