PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPSYX vs. MUBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPSYX vs. MUBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund (EPSYX) and MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPSYX achieves a 18.97% return, which is significantly higher than MUBFX's 7.42% return. Over the past 10 years, EPSYX has underperformed MUBFX with an annualized return of 10.38%, while MUBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.90% annualized return.


EPSYX

1D
-0.68%
1M
5.91%
YTD
18.97%
6M
19.85%
1Y
33.53%
3Y*
21.94%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
10.38%

MUBFX

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.91%
YTD
7.42%
6M
8.28%
1Y
20.75%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
12.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPSYX vs. MUBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPSYX
MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund
18.97%22.09%15.38%12.50%-5.37%17.40%-1.38%23.19%-9.23%16.31%
MUBFX
MainStay WMC Value Fund
7.42%14.74%10.72%9.62%-4.54%28.60%13.62%31.67%-6.89%22.71%

Correlation

The correlation between EPSYX and MUBFX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2005

0.85

The correlation between EPSYX and MUBFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPSYX vs. MUBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPSYX
EPSYX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
EPSYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPSYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPSYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EPSYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPSYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

MUBFX
MUBFX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
MUBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MUBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPSYX vs. MUBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund (EPSYX) and MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPSYXMUBFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.35

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.73

3.07

+1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.72

11.69

+7.03

EPSYX vs. MUBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPSYX Sharpe Ratio is 3.31, which is higher than the MUBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPSYX and MUBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPSYXMUBFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.31

1.93

+1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.62

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.72

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.64

-0.11

Drawdowns

EPSYX vs. MUBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPSYX drawdown since its inception was -48.92%, smaller than the maximum MUBFX drawdown of -53.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPSYX and MUBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPSYXMUBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.92%

-53.31%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-6.67%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-14.19%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.92%

-15.61%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.35%

-39.31%

+2.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.35%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.90%

-6.17%

-0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.75%

+0.07%

Volatility

EPSYX vs. MUBFX - Volatility Comparison

MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund (EPSYX) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) at 2.17%. This indicates that EPSYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPSYXMUBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

2.17%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.97%

7.72%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.31%

10.61%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.08%

14.80%

-1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.89%

17.90%

-3.01%

EPSYX vs. MUBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPSYX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than MUBFX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPSYX vs. MUBFX - Dividend Comparison

EPSYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, less than MUBFX's 6.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPSYX
MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund
6.68%8.24%10.13%2.71%2.64%2.66%2.74%6.87%9.87%2.24%3.18%9.65%
MUBFX
MainStay WMC Value Fund
6.87%7.38%5.24%4.49%5.82%81.14%3.79%8.43%11.90%11.15%2.53%19.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPSYX and MUBFX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPSYX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to MUBFX (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPSYX dropped -48.92% vs MUBFX's -53.31%.

EPSYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPSYX and MUBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer