PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPSYX vs. MBXIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPSYX vs. MBXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund (EPSYX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPSYX achieves a 21.42% return, which is significantly higher than MBXIX's 12.91% return. Over the past 10 years, EPSYX has outperformed MBXIX with an annualized return of 10.34%, while MBXIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.68% annualized return.


EPSYX

1D
0.82%
1M
1.79%
6M
16.15%
YTD
21.42%
1Y
33.38%
3Y*
20.67%
5Y*
13.57%
10Y*
10.34%
ALL TIME*
8.14%

MBXIX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-2.01%
6M
8.54%
YTD
12.91%
1Y
17.43%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
7.68%
ALL TIME*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EPSYX vs. MBXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPSYX
MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund
21.42%22.09%15.38%12.50%-5.37%17.40%-1.38%23.19%-9.23%16.31%
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
12.91%4.35%13.49%-0.67%7.72%16.89%-0.45%13.83%-2.16%13.99%

Correlation

The correlation between EPSYX and MBXIX is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2015

0.52

The correlation between EPSYX and MBXIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPSYX vs. MBXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EPSYX
EPSYX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
EPSYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPSYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPSYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EPSYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPSYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

MBXIX
MBXIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MBXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MBXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EPSYX vs. MBXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund (EPSYX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EPSYXMBXIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.40

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

3.88

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.35

14.92

+2.42

EPSYX vs. MBXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPSYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is higher than the MBXIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPSYX and MBXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EPSYX vs. MBXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPSYX drawdown since its inception was -48.92%, which is greater than MBXIX's maximum drawdown of -31.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPSYX and MBXIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPSYXMBXIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.92%

-31.73%

-17.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-3.85%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-15.59%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.92%

-15.59%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.35%

-31.73%

-4.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-2.68%

+2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

-3.95%

-2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.04%

+0.78%

Volatility

EPSYX vs. MBXIX - Volatility Comparison

MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund (EPSYX) has a higher volatility of 2.61% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) at 1.59%. This indicates that EPSYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPSYXMBXIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

1.59%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

4.89%

+3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.62%

6.90%

+3.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.06%

11.40%

+1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.78%

13.36%

+1.42%

EPSYX vs. MBXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPSYX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXIX's 2.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPSYX vs. MBXIX - Dividend Comparison

EPSYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.74%, while MBXIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPSYX
MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund
6.74%8.24%10.13%2.71%2.64%2.66%2.74%6.87%9.87%2.24%3.18%9.65%
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%2.63%2.25%7.74%0.00%4.27%5.18%3.33%3.33%1.91%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPSYX and MBXIX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPSYX has higher volatility (2.61%) compared to MBXIX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPSYX dropped -48.92% vs MBXIX's -31.73%.

EPSYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPSYX and MBXIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer