EPS vs. QGRW
EPS (WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund) and QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from WisdomTree - EPS tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Large Cap Index while QGRW tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EPS returned 22.06%/yr vs 29.10%/yr for QGRW. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EPS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QGRW.
Performance
EPS vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPS achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly lower than QGRW's 15.43% return.
EPS
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 4.89%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- 29.14%
- 3Y*
- 22.06%
- 5Y*
- 13.06%
- 10Y*
- 14.89%
QGRW
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 9.03%
- YTD
- 15.43%
- 6M
- 14.57%
- 1Y
- 35.66%
- 3Y*
- 29.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EPS vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPS WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund | 11.42% | 17.40% | 23.97% | 22.81% | -0.80% |
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 15.43% | 19.20% | 34.85% | 56.05% | -3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPS and QGRW is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022 | 0.86 |
The correlation between EPS and QGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
EPS vs. QGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPS
QGRW
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
EPS
QGRW
Financial Services
EPS
QGRW
Communication Services
EPS
QGRW
Consumer Cyclical
EPS
QGRW
Healthcare
EPS
QGRW
Industrials
EPS
QGRW
Energy
EPS
QGRW
Consumer Defensive
EPS
QGRW
Utilities
EPS
QGRW
Basic Materials
EPS
QGRW
-
Real Estate
EPS
QGRW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPS vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank
EPS
QGRW
EPS vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPS | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.35 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 2.32 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.29 | 9.08 | +7.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPS | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 2.06 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 1.66 | -1.10 |
Drawdowns
EPS vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPS drawdown since its inception was -54.43%, which is greater than QGRW's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPS and QGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPS | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.43% | -24.40% | -30.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.39% | -15.44% | +7.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.65% | -24.40% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -1.33% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -3.26% | -4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 3.94% | -2.15% |
Volatility
EPS vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) is 2.79%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that EPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPS | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 4.71% | -1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 13.67% | -4.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.34% | 17.40% | -6.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 21.08% | -5.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 21.08% | -3.43% |
EPS vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPS vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison
EPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than QGRW's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPS WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund | 1.14% | 1.26% | 1.47% | 1.73% | 1.95% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.70% | 2.02% | 1.59% | 1.99% | 2.15% |
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.14% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPS and QGRW have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QGRW has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to EPS (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPS dropped -54.43% vs QGRW's -24.40%.
On 3-year performance, QGRW leads with 29.10% vs 22.06% for EPS. On fees, EPS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, EPS has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 29.10% return vs 22.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EPS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QGRW.
EPS has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.07% for QGRW.
EPS tracks WisdomTree U.S. Large Cap Index, while QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for EPS and 0.28% for QGRW.
EPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPS and QGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer