PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPS vs. IUSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPS vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EPS having a 8.75% return and IUSG slightly higher at 8.94%. Over the past 10 years, EPS has underperformed IUSG with an annualized return of 14.94%, while IUSG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.74% annualized return.


EPS

1D
-0.17%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
8.75%
6M
7.52%
1Y
23.46%
3Y*
20.60%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
14.94%

IUSG

1D
-0.23%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
8.94%
6M
7.38%
1Y
24.89%
3Y*
24.91%
5Y*
13.70%
10Y*
17.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPS vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPS
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund
8.75%17.40%23.97%22.81%-15.82%27.47%12.02%32.54%-7.52%22.73%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
8.94%21.23%34.70%29.28%-28.81%31.26%32.65%30.62%-0.79%27.02%

Correlation

The correlation between EPS and IUSG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2007

0.89

The correlation between EPS and IUSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPS vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPS
IUSG

Technology

36.2%
50.8%

Financial Services

14.4%
8.7%

Communication Services

12.8%
15.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
8.4%

Healthcare

9.2%
6.4%

Industrials

5.1%
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
1.2%

Energy

3.9%
0.3%

Utilities

1.9%
1.1%

Basic Materials

1.3%
0.5%

Real Estate

0.8%
0.8%

Technology

EPS
36.2%
IUSG
50.8%

Financial Services

EPS
14.4%
IUSG
8.7%

Communication Services

EPS
12.8%
IUSG
15.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EPS
10.6%
IUSG
8.4%

Healthcare

EPS
9.2%
IUSG
6.4%

Industrials

EPS
5.1%
IUSG
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

EPS
3.9%
IUSG
1.2%

Energy

EPS
3.9%
IUSG
0.3%

Utilities

EPS
1.9%
IUSG
1.1%

Basic Materials

EPS
1.3%
IUSG
0.5%

Real Estate

EPS
0.8%
IUSG
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPS vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPS
EPS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
EPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPS vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EPSIUSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.26

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

1.91

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.53

7.76

+4.77

EPS vs. IUSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPS Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the IUSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPS and IUSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EPS vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPS drawdown since its inception was -54.43%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPS and IUSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPSIUSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.43%

-63.41%

+8.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.39%

-13.07%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.65%

-22.28%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

-32.21%

+8.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.79%

-32.35%

-3.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.18%

-5.45%

+2.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-21.40%

+13.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

3.22%

-1.34%

Volatility

EPS vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) is 4.66%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that EPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPSIUSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

7.16%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

13.61%

-3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.96%

16.89%

-4.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

21.06%

-4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.66%

20.48%

-2.82%

EPS vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EPS vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison

EPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than IUSG's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPS
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund
1.17%1.26%1.47%1.73%1.95%1.51%1.85%1.70%2.02%1.59%1.99%2.15%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.51%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, EPS and IUSG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IUSG has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to EPS (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPS dropped -54.43% vs IUSG's -63.41%.

On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.74% vs 14.94% for EPS. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, EPS has been the lower-risk option at 4.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.74% return vs 14.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for EPS.

EPS has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.51% for IUSG.

EPS tracks WisdomTree U.S. Large Cap Index, while IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for EPS and 0.04% for IUSG.

EPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPS and IUSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer