PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EPS vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EPS vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EPS (WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - EPS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Large Cap Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPS returned 14.99%/yr vs 13.38%/yr for BNO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EPS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

EPS vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPS achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 86.76% return. Over the past 10 years, EPS has outperformed BNO with an annualized return of 14.99%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.38% annualized return.

EPS

1D
0.24%
1M
5.38%
YTD
12.32%
6M
12.82%
1Y
30.76%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
13.41%
10Y*
14.99%

BNO

1D
0.76%
1M
-7.65%
YTD
86.76%
6M
83.45%
1Y
89.50%
3Y*
27.10%
5Y*
23.77%
10Y*
13.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPS vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPS
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund		12.32%17.40%23.97%22.81%-15.82%27.47%12.02%32.54%-7.52%22.73%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		86.76%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between EPS and BNO is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2010

0.26

The correlation between EPS and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund

United States Brent Oil Fund LP

Often compared with EPS:
EPS vs. VOOEPS vs. IUSEPS vs. VTIEPS vs. DTHEPS vs. BRK-BEPS vs. ^GSPCEPS vs. SWPPX
Often compared with BNO:
BNO vs. USOBNO vs. XLEBNO vs. USLBNO vs. BOILBNO vs. UNGBNO vs. UCOBNO vs. XOM

Return for Risk

EPS vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EPS
EPS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPS vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EPSBNODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.73

2.17

+0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.73

2.68

+1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.37

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

5.39

-1.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.47

10.23

+7.24

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EPS vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPS Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPS and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EPSBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.17

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.68

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.37

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.14

+0.42

Drawdowns

EPS vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPS drawdown since its inception was -54.43%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPS and BNO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EPSBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.43%

-87.06%

+32.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.39%

-17.87%

+9.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.65%

-23.75%

+6.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

-33.70%

+10.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.79%

-75.18%

+39.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-12.04%

+12.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-40.18%

+32.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

9.43%

-7.64%

Volatility

EPS vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) is 2.64%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 15.03%. This indicates that EPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EPSBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

15.03%

-12.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

36.08%

-27.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.31%

41.56%

-30.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

35.37%

-19.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.65%

36.68%

-19.03%

EPS vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPS vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

EPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EPS
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund		1.13%1.26%1.47%1.73%1.95%1.51%1.85%1.70%2.02%1.59%1.99%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

EPS and BNO have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (15.03%) compared to EPS (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPS dropped -54.43% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 10-year performance, EPS leads with 14.99% vs 13.38% for BNO. On fees, EPS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, EPS has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EPS has performed better with a 14.99% return vs 13.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EPS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

EPS has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

EPS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. EPS tracks WisdomTree U.S. Large Cap Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for EPS and 0.90% for BNO.

EPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPS and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer