EPR vs. CRM
EPR (EPR Properties) and CRM (Salesforce, Inc.) are both stocks. EPR operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate), while CRM operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, EPR returned 3.90%/yr vs 7.60%/yr for CRM. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EPR vs. CRM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPR achieves a 23.29% return, which is significantly higher than CRM's -37.06% return. Over the past 10 years, EPR has underperformed CRM with an annualized return of 3.90%, while CRM has yielded a comparatively higher 7.60% annualized return.
EPR
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 23.29%
- 6M
- 23.59%
- 1Y
- 13.06%
- 3Y*
- 17.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 3.90%
CRM
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- -37.06%
- 6M
- -36.31%
- 1Y
- -35.16%
- 3Y*
- -6.88%
- 5Y*
- -6.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
EPR vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPR EPR Properties | 23.29% | 20.52% | -1.25% | 38.83% | -14.61% | 50.60% | -52.09% | 17.13% | 3.59% | -3.41% |
CRM Salesforce, Inc. | -37.06% | -20.25% | 27.76% | 98.46% | -47.83% | 14.20% | 36.82% | 18.74% | 33.98% | 49.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPR and CRM is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2004 | 0.28 |
The correlation between EPR and CRM shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EPR:
$4.58B
CRM:
$144.49B
EPR:
$3.55
CRM:
$8.59
EPR:
16.86
CRM:
19.31
EPR:
0.36
CRM:
0.04
EPR:
6.54
CRM:
3.62
EPR:
1.98
CRM:
4.22
EPR:
$700.22M
CRM:
$42.83B
EPR:
$568.77M
CRM:
$33.25B
EPR:
$582.57M
CRM:
$12.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPR vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank
EPR
CRM
EPR vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EPR Properties (EPR) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPR | CRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.84 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | -0.95 | +1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.15 | -1.78 | +2.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPR vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPR drawdown since its inception was -82.02%, which is greater than CRM's maximum drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPR and CRM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPR | CRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.02% | -70.50% | -11.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.51% | -39.36% | +19.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | -54.70% | +35.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.63% | -58.62% | +22.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.02% | -58.62% | -23.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -54.33% | +54.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.58% | -16.15% | -0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.81% | 20.92% | -11.11% |
Volatility
EPR vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EPR Properties (EPR) is 5.14%, while Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) has a volatility of 16.76%. This indicates that EPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPR | CRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 16.76% | -11.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.49% | 31.59% | -15.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.44% | 38.09% | -15.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.16% | 37.07% | -10.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.44% | 35.38% | +7.06% |
Dividends
EPR vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison
EPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than CRM's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 1.28% | 0.63% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EPR EPR Properties | 5.99% | 7.05% | 7.68% | 6.81% | 8.62% | 3.16% | 4.66% | 6.37% | 5.62% | 6.23% | 5.35% | 6.21% |
Financials
EPR vs. CRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EPR Properties and Salesforce, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EPR vs. CRM - Profitability Comparison
EPR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPR Properties reported a gross profit of 180.96M and revenue of 181.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.8%.
CRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.
EPR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPR Properties reported an operating income of 100.62M and revenue of 181.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 55.5%.
CRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.
EPR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPR Properties reported a net income of 62.61M and revenue of 181.25M, resulting in a net margin of 34.5%.
CRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EPR and CRM have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRM has higher volatility (16.76%) compared to EPR (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPR dropped -82.02% vs CRM's -70.50%.
EPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPR and CRM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer