EPP vs. UGA
EPP (iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - EPP is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific ex-Japan Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPP returned 7.62%/yr vs 14.31%/yr for UGA. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EPP charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
EPP vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPP achieves a 6.84% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return. Over the past 10 years, EPP has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of 7.62%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.31% annualized return.
EPP
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- YTD
- 6.84%
- 6M
- 5.29%
- 1Y
- 13.95%
- 3Y*
- 12.66%
- 5Y*
- 4.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.62%
UGA
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- 64.09%
- 6M
- 60.42%
- 1Y
- 59.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 22.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
EPP vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPP iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF | 6.84% | 19.70% | 4.76% | 5.76% | -6.59% | 4.26% | 6.04% | 18.30% | -10.78% | 26.05% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 64.09% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPP and UGA is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2008 | 0.30 |
The correlation between EPP and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPP vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
EPP
UGA
EPP vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPP | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.30 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 3.17 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.68 | 9.39 | -4.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPP vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPP drawdown since its inception was -66.01%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPP and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPP | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.01% | -86.59% | +20.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.79% | -18.96% | +10.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.29% | -26.68% | +7.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.79% | -38.11% | +13.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.30% | -75.89% | +36.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.22% | -18.05% | +12.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.61% | -36.69% | +26.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 6.43% | -3.44% |
Volatility
EPP vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP) is 5.38%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that EPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPP | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 9.24% | -3.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.79% | 30.57% | -17.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 35.22% | -20.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 34.45% | -16.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 37.22% | -18.16% |
EPP vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPP has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPP vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
EPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPP iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF | 3.52% | 3.77% | 3.81% | 4.10% | 4.37% | 4.58% | 2.28% | 3.89% | 5.00% | 4.15% | 3.96% | 4.90% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPP and UGA have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to EPP (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPP dropped -66.01% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 14.31% vs 7.62% for EPP. On fees, EPP is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, EPP has been the lower-risk option at 5.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 14.31% return vs 7.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EPP is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
EPP has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
EPP is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. EPP tracks MSCI Pacific ex-Japan Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EPP and 0.75% for UGA.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPP and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer