EPMV vs. UCO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EPMV (Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF) and UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) are both exchange-traded funds - EPMV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Harbor, while UCO is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). EPMV is actively managed, while UCO is passively managed. Over the past year, EPMV returned 29.98% vs 120.48% for UCO. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. EPMV charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UCO.

Performance

EPMV vs. UCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPMV achieves a 18.43% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 149.12% return.

EPMV

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 6.82%
• YTD: 18.43%
• 6M: 19.33%
• 1Y: 29.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UCO

• 1D: 2.71%
• 1M: -4.64%
• YTD: 149.12%
• 6M: 137.09%
• 1Y: 120.48%
• 3Y*: 25.90%
• 5Y*: 22.16%
• 10Y*: -11.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPMV vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EPMV Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF	18.43%	13.68%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	149.12%	-0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between EPMV and UCO is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025	-0.16

Return for Risk

EPMV vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPMV

EPMV Risk / Return Rank: 63
EPMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
EPMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
EPMV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
EPMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
EPMV Martin Ratio Rank: 63

UCO

UCO Risk / Return Rank: 54
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 50
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPMV vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EPMV	UCO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	2.12	-0.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	2.46	+0.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.32	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.43	3.49	-0.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.30	6.60	+4.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EPMV vs. UCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the UCO Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPMV and UCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EPMV	UCO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	2.12	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.05	-0.34	+2.39

Drawdowns

EPMV vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPMV drawdown since its inception was -8.78%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPMV and UCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPMV	UCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.78%	-99.95%	+91.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.78%	-34.77%	+25.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-50.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-67.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-99.23%	+99.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.78%	-85.49%	+83.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	18.33%	-15.67%

Volatility

EPMV vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV) is 5.29%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a volatility of 20.83%. This indicates that EPMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPMV	UCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.29%	20.83%	-15.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.33%	46.44%	-35.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.19%	57.11%	-41.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.48%	59.78%	-44.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.48%	71.36%	-55.88%

EPMV vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPMV has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than UCO's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPMV vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison

EPMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
EPMV Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF	1.25%	1.48%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPMV and UCO in my portfolio?

EPMV and UCO have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPMV or UCO?

UCO has higher volatility (20.83%) compared to EPMV (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPMV dropped -8.78% vs UCO's -99.95%.

Which ETF is better, EPMV or UCO?

On 1-year performance, UCO leads with 120.48% vs 29.98% for EPMV. On fees, EPMV is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, EPMV has been the lower-risk option at 5.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPMV or UCO?

Over the 1-year period, UCO has performed better with a 120.48% return vs 29.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPMV or UCO?

EPMV is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPMV or UCO?

EPMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.00% for UCO.

What is the main difference between EPMV and UCO?

EPMV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while UCO is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPMV and 0.95% for UCO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.