EPHE vs. DGRO
EPHE (iShares MSCI Philippines ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPHE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Philippines Investable Market Index, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPHE returned -3.20%/yr vs 13.30%/yr for DGRO. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EPHE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
EPHE vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPHE achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 8.76% return. Over the past 10 years, EPHE has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of -3.20%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.30% annualized return.
EPHE
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- -1.12%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- -9.52%
- 3Y*
- 0.24%
- 5Y*
- -3.12%
- 10Y*
- -3.20%
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 22.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
EPHE vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPHE iShares MSCI Philippines ETF | -1.12% | 1.56% | -1.41% | 1.27% | -15.87% | -2.23% | -3.95% | 8.50% | -17.50% | 20.20% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 8.76% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPHE and DGRO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014 | 0.43 |
The correlation between EPHE and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EPHE vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPHE
DGRO
Industrials
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Industrials
EPHE
DGRO
Financial Services
EPHE
DGRO
Utilities
EPHE
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
EPHE
DGRO
Real Estate
EPHE
DGRO
-
Communication Services
EPHE
DGRO
Consumer Defensive
EPHE
DGRO
Energy
EPHE
DGRO
Basic Materials
EPHE
DGRO
Healthcare
EPHE
-
DGRO
Technology
EPHE
-
DGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPHE vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
EPHE
DGRO
EPHE vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPHE | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.43 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 3.50 | -4.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 13.52 | -14.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPHE | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.51 | 2.39 | -2.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.77 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.14 | 0.80 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.76 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
EPHE vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPHE drawdown since its inception was -53.82%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPHE and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPHE | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.82% | -35.10% | -18.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.22% | -6.47% | -9.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.42% | -14.03% | -7.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.96% | -19.31% | -13.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.62% | -35.10% | -16.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.62% | -0.28% | -34.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.98% | -3.44% | -17.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.08% | 1.67% | +7.41% |
Volatility
EPHE vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that EPHE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPHE | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 2.21% | +3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.77% | 6.91% | +6.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.87% | 9.48% | +9.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 13.82% | +4.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 16.62% | +5.62% |
EPHE vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPHE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPHE vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
EPHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than DGRO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
EPHE iShares MSCI Philippines ETF | 2.13% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 1.73% | 1.05% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 0.45% | 0.36% | 0.71% | 1.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPHE and DGRO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPHE has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPHE dropped -53.82% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.30% vs -3.20% for EPHE. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.30% return vs -3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EPHE.
EPHE has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 1.96% for DGRO.
EPHE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. EPHE tracks MSCI Philippines Investable Market Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EPHE and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPHE and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer