EPGFX vs. EPIBX
Compare and contrast key facts about EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) and EuroPac International Bond Fund (EPIBX).
EPGFX is managed by Euro Pacific Asset Management. It was launched on Jul 18, 2013. EPIBX is managed by Euro Pacific Asset Management. It was launched on Nov 14, 2010.
Performance
EPGFX vs. EPIBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EPGFX vs. EPIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPGFX EuroPac Gold Fund | 5.67% | 129.06% | 8.51% | 2.31% | -14.00% | -18.06% | 36.99% | 37.25% | -13.85% | 12.73% |
EPIBX EuroPac International Bond Fund | -1.68% | 12.90% | -3.30% | 9.94% | -7.34% | -4.60% | 7.45% | 5.13% | -3.63% | 9.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPGFX achieves a 5.67% return, which is significantly higher than EPIBX's -1.68% return. Over the past 10 years, EPGFX has outperformed EPIBX with an annualized return of 15.85%, while EPIBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.86% annualized return.
EPGFX
- 1D
- 6.92%
- 1M
- -19.20%
- YTD
- 5.67%
- 6M
- 17.58%
- 1Y
- 93.89%
- 3Y*
- 33.01%
- 5Y*
- 16.27%
- 10Y*
- 15.85%
EPIBX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 6M
- -0.29%
- 1Y
- 6.44%
- 3Y*
- 4.52%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- 1.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EPGFX vs. EPIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPGFX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EPIBX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EPGFX vs. EPIBX — Risk / Return Rank
EPGFX
EPIBX
EPGFX vs. EPIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) and EuroPac International Bond Fund (EPIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPGFX | EPIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.40 | 1.36 | +1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.62 | 1.91 | +0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.25 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 1.31 | +1.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.66 | 5.38 | +7.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPGFX | EPIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 1.36 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.27 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.33 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.10 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between EPGFX and EPIBX is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EPGFX vs. EPIBX - Dividend Comparison
EPGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.49%, more than EPIBX's 3.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPGFX EuroPac Gold Fund | 6.49% | 6.86% | 10.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.49% | 8.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.56% | 19.31% | 0.00% |
EPIBX EuroPac International Bond Fund | 3.31% | 3.25% | 2.92% | 2.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.91% |
Drawdowns
EPGFX vs. EPIBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPGFX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, which is greater than EPIBX's maximum drawdown of -24.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPGFX and EPIBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPGFX | EPIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.70% | -24.65% | -32.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.88% | -5.01% | -23.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.59% | -16.68% | -30.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.03% | -17.41% | -33.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.42% | -4.46% | -14.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.10% | -10.29% | -11.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.35% | 1.22% | +6.13% |
Volatility
EPGFX vs. EPIBX - Volatility Comparison
EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) has a higher volatility of 16.68% compared to EuroPac International Bond Fund (EPIBX) at 2.30%. This indicates that EPGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EPGFX | EPIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.68% | 2.30% | +14.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.39% | 3.34% | +29.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.05% | 4.87% | +34.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.14% | 5.65% | +26.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.65% | 5.69% | +26.96% |